Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Protecting Your Clients from Their Own Social Media
Before the advent of social media, the most feared type of surveillance was the video tape. Defense lawyers and insurance companies routinely spent tens of thousands of dollars in the hopes of landing a 30-second video showing the plaintiff engaged in an activity that he could not possibly do if he was as badly injured as he claimed. Stories are legend in which the injured plaintiff was videotaped changing a tire, running, skiing, walking with ease up and down stairs or shoveling snow. While each of these activities had the potential to severely damage the plaintiff's claims, it was a given that the videotaped footage would depict the plaintiff outside of his home. Indeed, it was “off limits” for the videographer to surreptitiously tape inside the plaintiff's home. But with the advent of social media, the boundary of the front door is a thing of the past. Now, with little more than the click of a mouse, insurance companies and defense attorneys have a window “inside the home” and into the life of the plaintiff unlike anything seen before. What was once “off limits” is now readily available and created by the most unlikely of partners: the plaintiff, his friends and family.
Platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, or YouTube may contain photographs, videos, or statements posted by your client or others that have the potential to harm their case. Whether it is a photograph from a trip or simply the daily minutiae of life, social media postings can be a wealth of information for your adversary. Trial attorneys and litigants must fully appreciate the potential impact of social media on a case. Postings of comments or photographs become part of the permanent record on the Internet. There is no such thing as deleting a post or erasing the past. Because of the potentially adverse consequences, trial lawyers are now duty bound to run a thorough social media search of their clients, adversaries, and witnesses in every case. To the extent an attorney fails to conduct such a search, not only will she be at a severe disadvantage in the case but her competence as a trial lawyer can be called into question.
Reviewing Social Media
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.