Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Senate Votes to Repeal FCC Internet Privacy Rules

By Lora Hollien
April 02, 2017

The Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) move to stop Internet service providers from collecting customers' personal information without consent has itself been halted, as reported by BuzzFeed and The New York Times.

The Senate voted 50-48 on March 24 to overturn the rules, with the House expected to follow suit. The vote was mostly along party lines, with two Republican senators abstaining.

The privacy protections, passed 3-2 by the FCC in October (see, “With Internet Service Privacy Rules, FCC Tees Up Proposal to Limit Arbitration,” New York Law Journal (Oct. 27, 2016), also along party lines, required customers to affirmatively opt-in to allow their broadband providers to collect and share information such as browsing history and location. Comcast Corp. and industry groups lobbied for the FCC to allow opt-out consent instead, and Republican commissioners criticized the rules for subjecting ISPs to tighter privacy regulations than so-called edge providers, such as Google and Facebook, which are required to follow consumer protection rules enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

In a joint statement issued earlier on March 1, Ajit Pai, who became chair of the FCC in January, and Maureen Ohlhausen, the acting chair of the FTC, wrote: “The federal government shouldn't favor one set of companies over another — and certainly not when it comes to a marketplace as dynamic as the Internet. So going forward, we will work together to establish a technology-neutral privacy framework for the online world.”

FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn and FTC Commissioner Terrell McSweeny, both Democrats, responded to the vote by saying the legislation “will frustrate the FCC's future efforts to protect the privacy of voice and broadband customers. It also creates a massive gap in consumer protection law as broadband and cable companies now have no discernible privacy requirements.”

*****
Lora Hollien
writes for Law.com, an ALM sibling of Internet Law & Strategy on which this article also appeared.

The Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) move to stop Internet service providers from collecting customers' personal information without consent has itself been halted, as reported by BuzzFeed and The New York Times.

The Senate voted 50-48 on March 24 to overturn the rules, with the House expected to follow suit. The vote was mostly along party lines, with two Republican senators abstaining.

The privacy protections, passed 3-2 by the FCC in October (see, “With Internet Service Privacy Rules, FCC Tees Up Proposal to Limit Arbitration,” New York Law Journal (Oct. 27, 2016), also along party lines, required customers to affirmatively opt-in to allow their broadband providers to collect and share information such as browsing history and location. Comcast Corp. and industry groups lobbied for the FCC to allow opt-out consent instead, and Republican commissioners criticized the rules for subjecting ISPs to tighter privacy regulations than so-called edge providers, such as Google and Facebook, which are required to follow consumer protection rules enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

In a joint statement issued earlier on March 1, Ajit Pai, who became chair of the FCC in January, and Maureen Ohlhausen, the acting chair of the FTC, wrote: “The federal government shouldn't favor one set of companies over another — and certainly not when it comes to a marketplace as dynamic as the Internet. So going forward, we will work together to establish a technology-neutral privacy framework for the online world.”

FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn and FTC Commissioner Terrell McSweeny, both Democrats, responded to the vote by saying the legislation “will frustrate the FCC's future efforts to protect the privacy of voice and broadband customers. It also creates a massive gap in consumer protection law as broadband and cable companies now have no discernible privacy requirements.”

*****
Lora Hollien
writes for Law.com, an ALM sibling of Internet Law & Strategy on which this article also appeared.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.