Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
District Court's Decision Retroactively Excusing Failure to Mark Patented Products Vacated By Federal Circuit
On April 19, 2017, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judge Taranto, Judge Chen and Judge Stoll issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge Stoll, Rembrandt Wireless Techs., LP v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., Case No. 2016-1729. Samsung appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The panel affirmed the district court's claim construction and denial of Samsung's motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) on obviousness and damages, but vacated and remanded the district court's denial of Samsung's motion to limit damages.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.