Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The wild world of mass torts can be irresistibly enticing to plaintiffs' attorneys from small firms. With the promises of huge fees and the suggestion of a nominal amount of work on each case, mass torts seem too good to be true.
However, John Grisham's novel, “The Litigators,” tells the cautionary tale of plaintiffs' attorneys who unwittingly follow the siren's song of mass torts only to shipwreck on the rocky island of sanctions, malpractice suits and financial ruin. In “The Litigators,” the “boutique firm” of Finley & Figg deviates from its meat-and-potatoes personal injury (PI) practice to pursue a bad drug claim against one of Big Pharma's most powerful companies. The story winds through creation of multidistrict litigation (MDL), deceptive negotiations by the pharmaceutical company and shifting allegiances of the mass tort firms that purport to be on the plaintiffs' side. Attorney David Zinc goes with the partners at Finley & Figg on their journey up the river of mass tort madness, which plays out like a litigation version of “The Heart of Darkness.”
Zinc is a wide-eyed associate who is new to plaintiffs' litigation, and his intentions are as pure as the driven snow. As the protagonist, he offers an outsider's view of both the messy world of PI practice in the tort reform era and the developing field of mass torts. In fact, “The Litigators” has a happy ending only because Zinc altruistically settles a traditional injury case; were it not for the fee he earned on that PI case, Finley & Figg would have been destroyed as a result of their venture into the world of mass torts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?