Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
House Advances Bill Limiting Class Action Lawsuits
By a vote of 220 to 201, the House of Representatives recently passed H.R. 985, known as The Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017. Its proposed changes to the class action litigation system would, among other things, make it harder for plaintiffs to get a class certified by requiring that “in a class action seeking monetary relief for personal injury or economic loss, each proposed class member [has] suffered the same type and scope of injury as the named class representatives.” Linda Lipsen, CEO of the American Association for Justice (AAJ), called the bill offensive and charged that, by this action, “the House of Representatives made it clear that it would rather shield powerful corporations from being held accountable for scamming, injuring, and discriminating against Americans, than protect our right to pursue justice.” Proponents of the bill, like Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX), who spoke in favor of the measure, claim that it doesn't prevent class claims from being made, but simply curtails the filing of frivolous class lawsuits. Not all are convinced: F. Paul Bland, executive director of Public Justice, told reporters, “It's pretty clear the bill would wipe away the vast majority of class actions.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.