Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b><i>Online Extra:</b></i><br> Legislation to Block a 'Netflix' Tax Is Shelved Amid Opposition
A Southern California assemblyman on Monday shelved legislation that would have blocked cities from taxing streaming video services such as Netflix and Hulu.
Assemblyman Sebastian Ridley-Thomas, D-Los Angeles, said he wants more time to work with the bill's critics, including the cable industry and local government agencies. By designating the bill AB 252 “for interim study” he could revive the legislation next year.
No city in California taxes streaming services. But many are studying the possibility, especially as consumers increasingly drop cable—a service that is subject to utility tax schemes—for untaxed online video streaming services such. Utility taxes generate about $2 billion annually for 157 cities and four counties, according to the California Local Government Finance Almanac.
Ridley-Thomas sought a five-year ban on taxing streaming video, arguing that the popular services should be allowed to thrive. The legislation pitted the tech industry against California cities as well as the California Cable & Telecommunications Association, whose members include Comcast and Charter Communications.
The bill “is not a solution unto itself,” Ridley-Thomas told the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee, which he chairs. “It's an attempt to foster a dialog.”
The Legislature should not be “picking winners and losers based on what the content delivery systems are,” Carolyn McIntyre, president of the California Cable & Telecommunications Association, said at Tuesday's hearing. “If you're going to have a [tax] policy make the policy technology neutral.”
Ridley-Thomas appeared to have the votes to move his bill out of the Revenue & Taxation Committee, but it faced another policy committee hearing—and steadfast opposition—before heading to the Assembly floor.
“If the bill moves today or not, we have to address this,” he said.
*****
Cheryl Miller writes for The Recorder, the San Francisco-based ALM sibling of Internet Law & Strategy.
A Southern California assemblyman on Monday shelved legislation that would have blocked cities from taxing streaming video services such as Netflix and Hulu.
Assemblyman Sebastian Ridley-Thomas, D-Los Angeles, said he wants more time to work with the bill's critics, including the cable industry and local government agencies. By designating the bill AB 252 “for interim study” he could revive the legislation next year.
No city in California taxes streaming services. But many are studying the possibility, especially as consumers increasingly drop cable—a service that is subject to utility tax schemes—for untaxed online video streaming services such. Utility taxes generate about $2 billion annually for 157 cities and four counties, according to the California Local Government Finance Almanac.
Ridley-Thomas sought a five-year ban on taxing streaming video, arguing that the popular services should be allowed to thrive. The legislation pitted the tech industry against California cities as well as the California Cable & Telecommunications Association, whose members include
The bill “is not a solution unto itself,” Ridley-Thomas told the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee, which he chairs. “It's an attempt to foster a dialog.”
The Legislature should not be “picking winners and losers based on what the content delivery systems are,” Carolyn McIntyre, president of the California Cable & Telecommunications Association, said at Tuesday's hearing. “If you're going to have a [tax] policy make the policy technology neutral.”
Ridley-Thomas appeared to have the votes to move his bill out of the Revenue & Taxation Committee, but it faced another policy committee hearing—and steadfast opposition—before heading to the Assembly floor.
“If the bill moves today or not, we have to address this,” he said.
*****
Cheryl Miller writes for The Recorder, the San Francisco-based ALM sibling of Internet Law & Strategy.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.