Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The issue of what constitutes a good-faith defense to a fraudulent transfer claim is a murky question that has produced a wide variety of reported decisions from appellate courts over the years. This issue has continued its serpentine course, but a recent Sixth Circuit opinion sheds some clear light on a complicated fact pattern. In this two-part article, we review the Sixth's Circuit's most recent decision in detail and offer some guidance on this thorny question.
Meoli v. Huntington Nat'l Bank
A defendant bank (Bank) in a fraudulent transfer suit “could not prove” its “good faith” defense for loan repayments it received after its “investigator discovered [the] fraudulent past” of the Ponzi scheme debtor's principal, but “failed to disclose that past to [the Bank's account] manager,” held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Feb. 8, 2017. Meoli v. Huntington Nat'l Bank, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2248, *28 (6th Cir. Feb. 8, 2017). As for “earlier … loan repayments” made before the investigator's discovery, held the court, “the bankruptcy court erred” in rejecting the Bank's good-faith defense merely because the Bank had “inquiry notice of … fraud.” Id.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?