Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Very few bankruptcy cases climb all the way up the judicial ladder to the United States Supreme Court. Sure, celebrity appeal might help; see, e.g., Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011) (the “Marshall” better known as “Anna Nicole Smith”), but barring that, SCOTUS has granted cert on just a handful of petitions originating from a bankruptcy court. Most often, the Court grants cert when there is a split in the courts of appeals.
That said, at the tail end of 2016, SCOTUS was treated to oral arguments in Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corporation, a case that, according to The New York Times, had the potential to “upend” the absolute priority scheme that serves as the backbone of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Jevic involved a dispute over the validity of a structured dismissal pursuant to a settlement agreement between the debtors and some — but not all — secured, priority, and general unsecured creditors.
The Issue
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at customercare@alm.com or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?