Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ljnstaff | Law Journal Newsletters
June 02, 2017

Tylenol MDL Is Settled

A settlement was reached Feb. 10 between McNeil Consumer Healthcare (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and more than 200 plaintiffs who claim liver damage from taking the drug maker's product, Tylenol. Details of the settlement were not made public, but according to court documents filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the agreement “establishes a global private settlement program to resolve Tylenol claims (whether filed or unfiled) of the claimants against the McNeil defendants and through which the claimants have agreed to settle their Tylenol claims.”

The defendant drug maker had been unsuccessful last summer in trying to block the testimony of one plaintiff's proposed expert witness, gastroenterologist and hepatologist Dr. Neil Kaplowitz, who was tapped to testify that Tylenol's active ingredient, Acetaminophen, can cause liver damage. U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel said of Dr. Kaplowitz at that time: “In rendering his general causation opinions, Dr. Kaplowitz considered the totality of the evidence and weighed the available information about acetaminophen-induced” by relying on “his own clinical experience, case reports, [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] documents including an analysis of the FDA's adverse event reports (AERs) database, published clinical studies and case series involving acetaminophen (including a study he coauthored in 2006), and animal studies.” The doctor was thus deemed qualified to offer his expert opinion at trial.

Tylenol MDL Is Settled

A settlement was reached Feb. 10 between McNeil Consumer Healthcare (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and more than 200 plaintiffs who claim liver damage from taking the drug maker's product, Tylenol. Details of the settlement were not made public, but according to court documents filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the agreement “establishes a global private settlement program to resolve Tylenol claims (whether filed or unfiled) of the claimants against the McNeil defendants and through which the claimants have agreed to settle their Tylenol claims.”

The defendant drug maker had been unsuccessful last summer in trying to block the testimony of one plaintiff's proposed expert witness, gastroenterologist and hepatologist Dr. Neil Kaplowitz, who was tapped to testify that Tylenol's active ingredient, Acetaminophen, can cause liver damage. U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel said of Dr. Kaplowitz at that time: “In rendering his general causation opinions, Dr. Kaplowitz considered the totality of the evidence and weighed the available information about acetaminophen-induced” by relying on “his own clinical experience, case reports, [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] documents including an analysis of the FDA's adverse event reports (AERs) database, published clinical studies and case series involving acetaminophen (including a study he coauthored in 2006), and animal studies.” The doctor was thus deemed qualified to offer his expert opinion at trial.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.