Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tylenol MDL Is Settled
A settlement was reached Feb. 10 between McNeil Consumer Healthcare (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and more than 200 plaintiffs who claim liver damage from taking the drug maker's product, Tylenol. Details of the settlement were not made public, but according to court documents filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the agreement “establishes a global private settlement program to resolve Tylenol claims (whether filed or unfiled) of the claimants against the McNeil defendants and through which the claimants have agreed to settle their Tylenol claims.”
The defendant drug maker had been unsuccessful last summer in trying to block the testimony of one plaintiff's proposed expert witness, gastroenterologist and hepatologist Dr. Neil Kaplowitz, who was tapped to testify that Tylenol's active ingredient, Acetaminophen, can cause liver damage. U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel said of Dr. Kaplowitz at that time: “In rendering his general causation opinions, Dr. Kaplowitz considered the totality of the evidence and weighed the available information about acetaminophen-induced” by relying on “his own clinical experience, case reports, [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] documents including an analysis of the FDA's adverse event reports (AERs) database, published clinical studies and case series involving acetaminophen (including a study he coauthored in 2006), and animal studies.” The doctor was thus deemed qualified to offer his expert opinion at trial.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?