Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Litigation

By ljnstaff | Law Journal Newsletters
June 02, 2017

Acquiescence to Bankruptcy Plan Extinguished Support Claimant's Rights

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has held that a woman who accepted the discharge of her ex-husband's debts to her in a bankruptcy proceeding is bound by that acceptance, even though she argued that the debt was non-dischargeable in bankruptcy because it was a support obligation. Penberthy v. Chickering, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6153 (S.D.N.Y. 1/13/17).

Beverly Penberthy and Donn A. Chickering entered into a Stipulation of Settlement in conjunction with their divorce proceedings on Feb. 2, 1994, providing that:

  • Chickering would immediately pay $1 million to Penberthy, which the document termed a “distributive award”;
  • Penberthy would take sole ownership of the marital residence in Rye, NY, along with two vehicles;
  • Chickering would cover the costs of Penberthy's medical care for three years by maintaining insurance for her and paying any medical costs not covered by it, unless Penberthy received free insurance from her employer; and
  • Chickering would pay Penberthy “as and for her support and maintenance,” $83,333 per month for a six-year term, which payments would total $6 million.

The settlement agreement was incorporated in the Judgment of Divorce, which was finalized on July 25, 1994.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.