Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A jury has handed down a mixed verdict in the trial of a Broadway press agent accused of scaring off an angel investor who stood ready to save the ill-fated production Rebecca — The Musical. After two days of deliberations, a six-person jury in Manhattan Supreme Court cleared publicist Marc Thibodeau of defamation but found him liable for tortious interference with prospective business relations. Rebecca Broadway v. Hotton, 65369/12.
Thibodeau already had been found liable by Commercial Division Justice Jeffrey Oing, at the summary judgment stage, for breach of his agent contract with Rebecca.
However, the jury — in a decision that case lawyers on both sides said was curious — awarded only $5,000 for breach of contract and $85,000 for tortious interference to plaintiff Rebecca Broadway Limited Partnership, the production company behind the never-made show. Producers from the partnership, including Broadway show veterans Ben Sprecher and Louise Forlenza, had been asking for more than $10 million.
“We think this is a complete vindication of Mr. Thibodeau,” said Thibodeau's lawyer Andrew Miltenberg. “It surprised me” that any damages were awarded, he added, “but given how much the plaintiffs were seeking, it really speaks to what the jurors thought of the alleged damages.”
Erik Groothuis, a lawyer for Rebecca Broadway Limited Partnership, saw it differently. “It's clearly not a vindication of Thibodeau,” he said. “Thibodeau had already been found liable on the breach of contract claim. Now, a jury has found him liable on the tortious interference claim. That is a finding that, contrary to his testimony that he was a whistleblower, says he tortiously interfered with his contract.”
But, “[o]bviously we were disappointed in the amount the jury awarded,” Groothuis said.
Both Groothuis and Miltenberg noted that $5,000 was the amount the production company paid Thibodeau for his services, and so how the jury pinpointed the amount seemed apparent. How jurors arrived at $85,000 for tortious interference was much harder to explain, they both said.
Rebecca — The Musical has never been shown in the United States, despite production attempts dating back to at least 2012. Lack of funding and one stage-worthy plot twist after another, including false promises of a major foreign investor named “Paul Abrams” who never actually existed, had kept it aground.
The musical is an adaptation of the 1938 Gothic novel Rebecca, by Daphne du Maurier, that tells the tale of a ghost haunting a young bride. In the tale of Rebecca's doomed U.S. production, “Paul Abrams” became a ghost of a sort, as well.
“This is the most fascinating case I've ever been a part of, both factually and legally,” Groothuis said last summer. “I've often thought somebody is going to make a musical about the making of this musical — and about the struggle it has been for my client.”
Sprecher and Forlenza acquired the English-speaking rights to the show in 2008 and planned to open it in London. But it was canceled after problems with a special effect. They switched their aim to the Great White Way, but by 2012 were forced to postpone performances because of lack of funding.
Meanwhile, Mark Hotton, a man hired to raise capital for the show who currently sits in federal prison, told Sprecher and Forlenza that he'd found a major British investor named “Paul Abrams.” As time came for the investment, though, Hotton announced that Abrams had contracted malaria in Africa and died.
A New York Times story in October 2012 then reported that several of the “investors” in the show, including “Abrams,” never existed. As producers scrambled, Larry Runsdorf, an angel investor from Florida, stepped forward. But soon after, he began getting emails from anonymous accounts that warned him that his money would be lost. One said the “cloud hanging over this production is very, very dark”; another included the Times article. He quickly backed out.
The surreptitious emails had come from publicist Thibodeau, leading to the lawsuit before Justice Oing.
Miltenberg, a partner at Nesenoff & Miltenberg in Manhattan, said he believes the jurors cleared his client of defaming the production because there was “a very strong feeling that Marc Thibodeau was expressing an opinion and telling the truth” when he informed Runsdorf that the show was troubled. “What he said was either his opinion or it was information that was readily available to the public from two New York Times articles and a New York Post article,” Miltenberg added. “None of this was a surprise to anybody, including the angel investor.”
Miltenberg also noted that Runsdorf never took the stand for plaintiffs. “How can you say that but for this email from Thibodeau, this man would have invested two and quarter million dollars, if he wasn't there to testify?” Miltenberg said. “They just had a lot of speculative testimony. And they went to the jurors to raise money for this show, and the jury said no to it.”
But Ronald Russo, another lawyer for the production and of counsel at Schlam Stone, said in a statement, “A six-member jury made clear … that Mr. Thibodeau was not a 'whistleblower,' as he has contended, and found that his having sent four emails under false names was wrongful.”
Groothuis added that the plaintiffs will consider whether there are issues for appeal in the lawsuit. Sprecher and Forlenza, he added, finally let go of the rights to Rebecca at the end of 2016; they could no longer afford to extend the rights from an Austrian company that holds them. Rebecca had a different life in Vienna. Starting in 2006, it played to sold-out houses for three years.
*****
Jason Grant is a litigation reporter for the New York Law Journal, an ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance.
A jury has handed down a mixed verdict in the trial of a Broadway press agent accused of scaring off an angel investor who stood ready to save the ill-fated production Rebecca — The Musical. After two days of deliberations, a six-person jury in Manhattan Supreme Court cleared publicist Marc Thibodeau of defamation but found him liable for tortious interference with prospective business relations. Rebecca Broadway v. Hotton, 65369/12.
Thibodeau already had been found liable by Commercial Division Justice Jeffrey Oing, at the summary judgment stage, for breach of his agent contract with Rebecca.
However, the jury — in a decision that case lawyers on both sides said was curious — awarded only $5,000 for breach of contract and $85,000 for tortious interference to plaintiff Rebecca Broadway Limited Partnership, the production company behind the never-made show. Producers from the partnership, including Broadway show veterans Ben Sprecher and Louise Forlenza, had been asking for more than $10 million.
“We think this is a complete vindication of Mr. Thibodeau,” said Thibodeau's lawyer Andrew Miltenberg. “It surprised me” that any damages were awarded, he added, “but given how much the plaintiffs were seeking, it really speaks to what the jurors thought of the alleged damages.”
Erik Groothuis, a lawyer for Rebecca Broadway Limited Partnership, saw it differently. “It's clearly not a vindication of Thibodeau,” he said. “Thibodeau had already been found liable on the breach of contract claim. Now, a jury has found him liable on the tortious interference claim. That is a finding that, contrary to his testimony that he was a whistleblower, says he tortiously interfered with his contract.”
But, “[o]bviously we were disappointed in the amount the jury awarded,” Groothuis said.
Both Groothuis and Miltenberg noted that $5,000 was the amount the production company paid Thibodeau for his services, and so how the jury pinpointed the amount seemed apparent. How jurors arrived at $85,000 for tortious interference was much harder to explain, they both said.
Rebecca — The Musical has never been shown in the United States, despite production attempts dating back to at least 2012. Lack of funding and one stage-worthy plot twist after another, including false promises of a major foreign investor named “Paul Abrams” who never actually existed, had kept it aground.
The musical is an adaptation of the 1938 Gothic novel Rebecca, by Daphne du Maurier, that tells the tale of a ghost haunting a young bride. In the tale of Rebecca's doomed U.S. production, “Paul Abrams” became a ghost of a sort, as well.
“This is the most fascinating case I've ever been a part of, both factually and legally,” Groothuis said last summer. “I've often thought somebody is going to make a musical about the making of this musical — and about the struggle it has been for my client.”
Sprecher and Forlenza acquired the English-speaking rights to the show in 2008 and planned to open it in London. But it was canceled after problems with a special effect. They switched their aim to the Great White Way, but by 2012 were forced to postpone performances because of lack of funding.
Meanwhile, Mark Hotton, a man hired to raise capital for the show who currently sits in federal prison, told Sprecher and Forlenza that he'd found a major British investor named “Paul Abrams.” As time came for the investment, though, Hotton announced that Abrams had contracted malaria in Africa and died.
A
The surreptitious emails had come from publicist Thibodeau, leading to the lawsuit before Justice Oing.
Miltenberg, a partner at
Miltenberg also noted that Runsdorf never took the stand for plaintiffs. “How can you say that but for this email from Thibodeau, this man would have invested two and quarter million dollars, if he wasn't there to testify?” Miltenberg said. “They just had a lot of speculative testimony. And they went to the jurors to raise money for this show, and the jury said no to it.”
But Ronald Russo, another lawyer for the production and of counsel at
Groothuis added that the plaintiffs will consider whether there are issues for appeal in the lawsuit. Sprecher and Forlenza, he added, finally let go of the rights to Rebecca at the end of 2016; they could no longer afford to extend the rights from an Austrian company that holds them. Rebecca had a different life in Vienna. Starting in 2006, it played to sold-out houses for three years.
*****
Jason Grant is a litigation reporter for the
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.