Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
No Facebook Evidence Without a Witness
New York's Appellate Division, Second Department, has barred a medical malpractice defendant from submitting into evidence Facebook posts of the plaintiff, allegedly describing his physical activities, for lack of proper authentication. Lantigua v. Goldstein, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3115; 2017 NY Slip Op 03164 (N.Y. App. Div., 2nd Dept., 4/26/17).
The case involves a patient who brought suit in a Brooklyn court 13 years ago. It was set to go to trial in 2013, but defendants Jeffrey Goldstein and his medical practice moved for leave to conduct a fourth deposition of plaintiff Roy Lantigua, citing new evidence. At the 2014 deposition that followed, the defendant presented the plaintiff with 13 pages of computer printouts containing statements allegedly attributable to Lantigua. The Facebook posts mentioned going out to bars, walking across the 1½-mile Williamsburg Bridge, and included statements like, “having a great workout.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?