Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Employees the world over were locked out of their computers on May 12 and over that following weekend as an insidious and widespread cyberattack nicknamed “WannaCry” rolled through the Internet and into headlines. See, “WannaCry Ransomware: What We Know Monday,” NPR.org (May 15, 2017). The ransomware attack, which for now seems to have been halted, encrypts a computer or network's data and demands $300 in the online currency bitcoin to unlock the data. See, “'Accidental Hero' Halts Ransomware Attack and Warns: 'This Is Not Over,'” The Guardian (May 13, 2017).
While data breach experts said the attack was not particularly complex — it was distributed through an infected email attachment and could have been prevented by staying up-to-date with a Windows patch — the scale of the breaches served as a reminder of the seemingly ubiquitous risk of cyberattacks.
Luckily for U.S. law firms, those same experts said it was unlikely that this particular ransomware attack hit many of them. The targets were disproportionately located overseas and in the health care industry. However, experts fear that the aftershocks could be felt here. See, “Ransomware's Aftershocks Feared as U.S. Warns of Complexity,” New York Times (May 14, 2017).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?