Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CT Supreme Court Is Asked to Throw Out Sandy Hook Case Against Gun Manufacturers
Gun manufacturers Remington and Bushmaster have asked the Connecticut Supreme Court to throw out the case brought against them by the families of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. In that incident, an emotionally disturbed young man, Adam Lanza, murdered his mother in their shared home, then travelled to the nearby school where he opened fire on children and teachers using an AR-15 rifle manufacturered by Bushmaster, which is owned by Remington.
The plaintiffs are suing under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUPTA) claiming negligent entrustment: essentially, that the manufacturers knew their product was a dangerous assault rifle meant to be used as a weapon in wartime, and that they aggressively marketed it as such to the general public.
In their 70-page brief to the court, the defendants argue that the theory on which the plaintiffs rely is one not recognized in Connecticut. They claim that the AR-15 is not a weapon of war and that the plaintiffs' description of it as such is merely an attempt to “demonize the rifle.” They also describe CUTPA's purpose as being “to protect consumers, business competitors, and others in commercial relationships with a defendant who has harmed them in a marketplace transaction,” yet none of the plaintiffs in this case purchased a gun manufactured by the defendants.
CT Supreme Court Is Asked to Throw Out Sandy Hook Case Against Gun Manufacturers
Gun manufacturers Remington and Bushmaster have asked the Connecticut Supreme Court to throw out the case brought against them by the families of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. In that incident, an emotionally disturbed young man, Adam Lanza, murdered his mother in their shared home, then travelled to the nearby school where he opened fire on children and teachers using an AR-15 rifle manufacturered by Bushmaster, which is owned by Remington.
The plaintiffs are suing under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUPTA) claiming negligent entrustment: essentially, that the manufacturers knew their product was a dangerous assault rifle meant to be used as a weapon in wartime, and that they aggressively marketed it as such to the general public.
In their 70-page brief to the court, the defendants argue that the theory on which the plaintiffs rely is one not recognized in Connecticut. They claim that the AR-15 is not a weapon of war and that the plaintiffs' description of it as such is merely an attempt to “demonize the rifle.” They also describe CUTPA's purpose as being “to protect consumers, business competitors, and others in commercial relationships with a defendant who has harmed them in a marketplace transaction,” yet none of the plaintiffs in this case purchased a gun manufactured by the defendants.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.