Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In 1982, jazz organist Jimmy Smith released an album on Elektra/Asylum called Off The Top. The last track on the album was a spoken-word recording titled “Jimmy Smith Rap” (JSR). One of the lyrics proclaimed: “Jazz is the only real music that's gonna last. All that other bullshit is here today and gone tomorrow. But jazz was, is and always will be.” The album label did not list a composer for JSR, nor was the composition copyright registered with the U.S. Copyright Office or a performing rights organization prior to the album's release. Jimmy Smith died in 2005.
In September 2013, Cash Money Records and Universal Republic Records released the album Nothing Was the Same by Drake. The last song on the album was “Pound Cake/Paris Morton Music 2″ (Pound Cake). “Pound Cake” sampled about 35 seconds of JSR and made some minor changes to Smith's recitation of the words. For example, “Pound Cake” altered Smith's statements about jazz to claim: “Only real music is gonna last, all that other bullshit is here today and gone tomorrow.” In producing the album, Cash Money and Universal Republic obtained a license for the JSR recording, but not for the JSR composition.
Stephen Hacker is the principal of Hebrew Hustle, a music publisher that represents songwriters for licensing their copyrights. Approximately one week before the release of Nothing Was the Same, Hacker reviewed an advance copy of the album credits. After noticing that Cash Money/Universal Republic had secured a license for the JSR recording but not the composition, Hacker contacted Raymond Janifer, Jimmy Smith's nephew and a co-manager of Smith's estate. The estate entered into a co-publishing agreement with Hebrew Hustle, assigning 50% of the copyright in the JSR composition to the publisher and granting the exclusive right to exploit the work. Hebrew Hustle registered the JSR composition with the U.S. Copyright Office. Two months after the album's release, the estate sent to the labels a cease and desist letter, which was the first time Cash Money and Universal Republic learned of a song copyright interest in JSR. The estate and Hebrew Hustle brought a copyright infringement action against the record labels, Drake and other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Estate of Smith v. Cash Money Records, 14cv2703.
Proving Song Ownership
Both sides moved for summary judgment. The district court observed that to establish their infringement claim, the plaintiffs would need to prove that they owned the JSR song copyright and that the defendants had copied original elements of JSR. Southern District Judge William H. Pauley III found, however, that the evidence in the record did not resolve the question of JSR's ownership. While copyright registration normally constitutes prima facie evidence of copyright ownership, the court noted that the estate had registered the JSR song copyright 31 years after JSR was originally published and only in response to the defendants' sampling of JSR on Drake's album. Under the circumstances, Judge Pauley ruled that the plaintiffs' registration certificate was insufficient to establish ownership, that a genuine issue of material fact barred summary judgment for the plaintiffs on the ownership issue.
The district court considered a statement printed on Smith's Off the Top album cover announcing that the album was recorded with “no charts, music format or nothing — just playing what we felt — off the top of our heads.” The court found that this information spoke only to the process of recording Off the Top, not the authorship of the JSR song and that here, too, there was a dispute of material fact. The estate had offered the declaration of Raymond Janifer, who asserted that Smith did not write music on paper, but made up the words before performing and recording on tape. But the court discounted Janifer's assertion because Janifer did not witness Smith record JSR and his lack of firsthand knowledge made his testimony less probative. Janifer also claimed that, prior to the release of Off the Top, Jimmy Smith had told him, “I laid down a dynamite rap on them and I hope they don't cut it off the album.” As to Janifer's hearsay statement, the court observed that there was no indication that Smith was referring to JSR and not some other song that was, in fact, cut from the Off the Top album.
District Judge Pauley found the song listings on Off the Top were not helpful, as they listed the writers for each song except JSR. While the album's packaging contained a copyright notice identifying Smith's label Elektra/Asylum Records as copyright owner, the notice was a ©, which applies only to the visual content of the product. Because the lyrics were not displayed on the album jacket, the notice did not apply to the JSR composition. The plaintiffs also argued that the website discogs.com listed Jimmy Smith as the writer of JSR, but the court observed that discogs.com is a user-built database to which anyone can contribute, that there was no evidence that whoever entered this data had any personal knowledge of JSR's authorship.
After this, Judge Pauley discussed the legal standards for determining whether JSR and “Pound Cake” were substantially similar. The defendants contended the sampled portion of JSR was primarily a cliché that was not original enough to warrant copyright protection. The court cautioned against dissecting JSR and “Pound Cake” and comparing only the copyrightable elements, but otherwise declined to address the substantial similarity issue, remarking that a determination of whether the copied portions of JSR were entitled to copyright protection depended on “a subjective assessment better suited for a jury than a court.”
The Fair Use Defense
But the defendants had raised a fair use defense. Examining the purpose and character of the use of the sample, Judge Pauley found that by editing the recording from “Jazz is the only real music that's gonna last” to “Only real music is gonna last,” Drake transformed Jimmy Smith's dismissive comment into a statement on the staying power of “real music,” regardless of genre. Thus, the defendants' purpose in using Smith's rap were “sharply different” from Smith's goal in creating it.
Regarding the amount and substantiality of the portion of the JSR the defendants used, the plaintiffs argued using 35 seconds of the one-minute JSR track was unreasonable. But the court ruled that the defendants needed to use the “full extent of the commentary” to convey that many musicians make recordings in similar ways but that only “real music” — regardless of process or genre — will stand the test of time. In the district court's words, the defendants needed to use Smith's extended commentary “to drive the point home.”
Finally, Judge Pauley declared there was no evidence to suggest that Drake's “Pound Cake” usurped any potential market for JSR or any derivative works. JSR was a spoken-word criticism of non-jazz music at the end of a jazz album. It targeted a “sharply different primary market” than “Pound Cake,” a hip-hop track. Moreover, the Plaintiffs made no attempt to develop a market for licensed derivative uses of the JSR composition copyright until after the defendants used it on “Pound Cake.”
Based on its finding of fair use, the district court granted the defendants' summary judgment motion.
As for the court's rejection of the estate's copyright registration certificate, waiting to register a work until after an infringement occurs can lead a court to afford the registration certificate little weight for proving ownership. The court's struggle with the Off the Top album's failure to list the writer of JSR is also instructive. Publishers should provide labels with writer information for all tracks, even if, as in the case of an improvised solo rap, authorship may seem obvious.
***** Vincent Peppe is an attorney based in Nashville, TN, and a Music Business faculty member at Belmont University. He can be reached at [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.