Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In an article we penned in early April, we discussed the federal circuit split over the interpretation of the Equal Pay Act (EPA) and the growing number of state and local jurisdictions enacting legislation that restricts an employer from inquiring into or using an employee's salary history. See Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, “New Restrictions on Using Earnings History to Set Compensation,” NYLJ (April 4, 2017). Shortly thereafter, on April 5, 2017, the New York City Council passed a bill to amend the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), which will impose similar restrictions on New York City employers. (New York City Bill Int. No. 1253-A will be codified at N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(25) et seq.)
On May 4, 2017, Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the bill, which will become effective on Oct. 31, 2017. Accordingly, Halloween could become a very scary day for New York City employers. In the article herein, we review additional recent developments in the law governing employer inquiries into and reliance on the compensation history of prospective employees — and analyze the New York City ordinance within this greater context.
Background
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?