Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A Texas company has accused Snap Inc. of infringing four patents with systems that allow Snapchat users to scan “Snapcodes” and add friends on the popular social networking app.
In a complaint filed on June 13 in Delaware federal court, Kaldren LLC said the California-based company directly infringed the patents when it launched its Snapcode technology in 2015, and has continued to induce infringement by marketing and promoting the feature on Snapchat, which is available on the Apple Inc. App Store and Google Play.
Snapcodes have become an increasingly visible feature on the Snapchat platform. Initially introduced under the name “Snaptags,” Snapcodes are patterns that include a two-dimensional pattern of black dots set against a yellow background, displayed around a ghost-shaped border.
Each account is given a Snapcode, and Snapchat users are able to use their phones to scan the distinctive arrangement and instantly add friends on the app. The images are then decoded and processed through a complex technological infrastructure on Snap networks.
According to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office records, the patents-in-suit were invented by Walter and Thomas Antognini. They were assigned to Cobblestone Software Inc. in Lexington, Massachusetts, between 2000 and 2012. It was not clear from court documents when Kaldren acquired the patents, each of the patents was presumed valid under U.S. patent law, the company said.
Kaldren is seeking past and future damages in the case, as well as pre- and post-judgment interest.
Snap's press office did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the suit.
Headquartered in Los Angeles, Snap was founded in 2011 by Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy. The company went public earlier this year with an initial public offering, propelled in part by the strength of its Snapchat app.
The app allows users to share images and short videos within their social network that disappear within seconds of being opened. The company's related products include Spectacles and Bitmoji.
The case, captioned Kaldren v. Snap, has not yet been assigned to a judge as of this writing.
Kaldren is represented by Stamatios Stamoulis and Richard C. Weinblatt of Stamoulis & Weinblatt. Snap has not yet enlisted attorneys to defend the case, according to an online docket-tracking service.
*****
Tom McParland writes for our ALM sibling, Delaware Law Weekly. He can be contacted at 215-557-2485 or at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @TMcParlandTLI.
A Texas company has accused Snap Inc. of infringing four patents with systems that allow Snapchat users to scan “Snapcodes” and add friends on the popular social networking app.
In a complaint filed on June 13 in Delaware federal court, Kaldren LLC said the California-based company directly infringed the patents when it launched its Snapcode technology in 2015, and has continued to induce infringement by marketing and promoting the feature on Snapchat, which is available on the
Snapcodes have become an increasingly visible feature on the Snapchat platform. Initially introduced under the name “Snaptags,” Snapcodes are patterns that include a two-dimensional pattern of black dots set against a yellow background, displayed around a ghost-shaped border.
Each account is given a Snapcode, and Snapchat users are able to use their phones to scan the distinctive arrangement and instantly add friends on the app. The images are then decoded and processed through a complex technological infrastructure on Snap networks.
According to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office records, the patents-in-suit were invented by Walter and Thomas Antognini. They were assigned to Cobblestone Software Inc. in Lexington,
Kaldren is seeking past and future damages in the case, as well as pre- and post-judgment interest.
Snap's press office did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the suit.
Headquartered in Los Angeles, Snap was founded in 2011 by Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy. The company went public earlier this year with an initial public offering, propelled in part by the strength of its Snapchat app.
The app allows users to share images and short videos within their social network that disappear within seconds of being opened. The company's related products include Spectacles and Bitmoji.
The case, captioned Kaldren v. Snap, has not yet been assigned to a judge as of this writing.
Kaldren is represented by Stamatios Stamoulis and Richard C. Weinblatt of Stamoulis & Weinblatt. Snap has not yet enlisted attorneys to defend the case, according to an online docket-tracking service.
*****
Tom McParland writes for our ALM sibling, Delaware Law Weekly. He can be contacted at 215-557-2485 or at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @TMcParlandTLI.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.