Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Elena recently initiated divorce proceedings against her husband, Marcus. She told her family law attorney that he is “controlling” and quick to anger. But suddenly, Elena seems reluctant to continue the proceedings. When her attorney asks why, she confesses that she is an undocumented immigrant. Her husband, a U.S. citizen, had started filling out paperwork to help her get a green card, but never completed the process. He is threatening her with deportation if she goes through with the divorce. She is afraid to keep living with him, but fears being put into removal proceedings and separated from her two children. (“Removal” is the current technical term for deportation proceedings to remove someone from the United States.)
Marriage to a U.S. citizen, by itself, does not confer legal status on an undocumented immigrant. However, a valid marriage — one not entered into for the purpose of evading immigration laws — can provide an avenue to legal status in some circumstances. Thus, if an undocumented immigrant gets divorced, she will generally lose that avenue.
Introductory Issues
A family law practitioner should understand the basics of immigration law in order to properly advise his or her client about the effect of a divorce on immigration status. If a client was not born in the United States, the attorney should determine the client's immigration status by asking appropriate questions and identifying relevant issues. But family law attorneys are often not familiar with immigration law. Accordingly, rather than proceed to address these issues, it is strongly recommended that the family law attorney consult with an immigration attorney. Still, a general knowledge of the issues that arise when one party is an immigrant will allow the attorney to give at least rudimentary advice, which can then be followed up through consultation with a lawyer with greater immigration law expertise.
To this end, the family lawyer should first be familiar with the following basic immigration terms:
Effect of Divorce on Immigration Status
While lawful status can be obtained based on a marital relationship, several thorny issues are raised if the couple divorces. (For the purposes of this article, we will assume the immigrant spouse is female.)
First, at some point, the client might be detained or referred for removal, an administrative process where the immigrant has an opportunity to present any “right to relief” to remain in the United States. If she is no longer married, she cannot qualify for relief through a spousal visa petition. (Marrying while in deportation proceedings is exceedingly suspect and triggers application of a higher standard of proof. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sec. 245(e) (3).)
Second, even if she is not placed into removal proceedings, she has no right to work. If her husband does not provide much in the way of alimony or child support, she will be in greater economic difficulty, and lack money to contest any failure to contribute. (The right to receive alimony is not dependent on immigration status. Undocumented immigrants have the same rights as lawful residents in divorce proceedings.)
Third, the U.S. citizen spouse may try to use the wife's undocumented status as a lever in a custody determination. State custody laws generally do not include immigration status of either parent or children as a factor to be considered in custody determination. See “Custody of Children in Mixed-Status Families: Preventing the Misunderstanding and Misuse of Immigration Status in State-Court Custody Proceedings,” Fata, Orloff et al, Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2013) at 196. Nevertheless, in reality, family court judges in custody battles between a U.S. citizen and undocumented immigrant may have difficulty applying the best interests policy when the undocumented parent is under a potential threat of removal. “The Intersection of Immigration Status and the New York Family Courts,' Fund for Modern Courts, Feb. 2015 at 18.
So, while immigration status is not in itself a reason to deny custody and does not mean a parent is not fit, the court, applying the “best interest of the child” analysis, may be influenced by the mother's immigration status. After all, if the undocumented parent cannot obtain work, has no decent place to live, or is under stress due to uncertainty about her right to remain in the United States, her family's well-being may be affected. These factors might figure into the court's calculus about the child's best interest.
Fourth, if the client does face removal, this will impact her relationship with her children, as she can be deported even if they are U.S. citizens. The mother would face the impossible choice of leaving and not seeing her children again — perhaps, because due to prior unlawful presence, she could be barred from re-entering the U.S. for many years — or bringing them with her to a country with which they may be wholly unfamiliar (if the ex-spouse does not object).
The undocumented wife may also struggle with leaving children in the United States if their only caretaker is a parent she considers unfit. (Additionally, keep in mind that if the children do not have lawful citizenship or resident status, they also could be subject to removal. In some cases, children of a U.S. citizen father or step-father may have become U.S. citizens by derivation, which should be explored.)
Faced with these difficulties, the client's attorney should explore whether a divorcing spouse has any way to obtain legal status so that she will have the option to find decent paying work, obtain health care and keep her family together.
In Part Two of this article, we will discuss the possibility of, in certain circumstances, obtaining legal status through the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).
***** Laurie J. Woog is Of Counsel with Mandelbaum Salsburg, Roseland, NJ. The author wishes to thank Elisabete Rocha, an associate at the firm, for her research assistance.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.