Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A man returns home unexpectedly, finds his wife with another man, and shoots him. It's an unfortunate chain of events, but certainly not unheard of. What is unusual is how the case of a love triangle like this one could lead to an Eleventh Circuit decision about homeowners' insurance. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. Roberts, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10933, (11th Cir. 6/21/17).
An Intentional Shooting
Bobby Roberts had owned a business in Alabama since 2009, but he sometimes went home to Georgia to visit his wife, Kim. One evening in January 2013, around 10:00 p.m., Bobby went to the couple's home and found his wife in the kitchen with another man, Sinatra Miller. Suspicious that they were carrying on an affair, Bobby told them to remain where they were, then walked into a bedroom. Miller left the home, but Bobby followed him outside and shot him several times with an automatic handgun. Bobby admitted that he shot Miller intentionally — it had been no accident. He was charged with aggravated assault, aggravated battery, pointing a handgun at another and family violence.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?