Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pay Equity Litigation Trends
New requirements and prohibitions on compensation practices around the country are making pay equity a hot topic. These obligations seek to address the “gender pay gap,” which the latest reports estimate is at a little over 20%, with women across all occupations having median earnings around 78% of the median earnings of men. Although some dispute whether there is in fact a gender pay gap, its existence is so widely accepted that many jurisdictions are taking steps to promote pay equity. This article provides an overview of trends in pay equity litigation.
Background
In 2016 alone, several states, including California, Maryland, Massachusetts and New York, implemented new pay equity legislation that imposes stricter standards on employers. These come with severe consequences for noncompliance. For example, the New York legislature amended the state Labor Law, effective 2016, to bar employers from prohibiting employees from discussing, disclosing, or asking about their compensation. This pay transparency provision (designed to facilitate employees' sharing of pay data and to enhance the likelihood that pay disparities are discovered in the regular course of employee interactions and cannot be kept hidden by the employer) is comparable to newly added features of the fair pay laws in many other states. The New York Labor Law amendments also significantly increase available liquidated damages, to three times the amount of wages due.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?