Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
While they are a prime responsibility for attorneys facing litigation or regulatory investigations, legal holds are not always executed as effectively as they should be. For many, it is a problem of managing data in multiple locations; for others, it's the challenge of having unreliable data custodians.
But many attorneys are betting that these problems can be mitigated through the use of automated technology, according to Zapproved's 2017 Legal Hold and Data Preservation Benchmark Report, a survey of legal, compliance, IT and corporate staff from more than 50 U.S. corporations.
The survey found that in 2017, over half — 57% — of corporations are using automated software for legal holds, marking the first time in the survey's history that a majority of respondents are employing automated legal holds. From 2014 to 2016, the percentage using this technology hovered around 46%, while in 2013, it was at 34%.
Still, some 37%, a sizable minority of those surveyed, rely on manual legal hold processes, with 58% of those respondents expressing confidence in the defensibility of their manual process. Among those using automated legal holds, however, confidence in the automated procedures was higher, at 79%.
Brad Harris, vice president of products at Zapproved, explained that corporate teams are more confident using automated legal holds because it allows for more uniform and defined processes.
The survey found that 84% of those using automated legal holds sent periodic reminders to their custodians, while 56% of those using manual legal hold processes did the same. Among those sending out release notification once a matter is resolved, the number skewed 75% to 58% in favor of automated legal hold users.
Harris noted that effective legal holds are needed given the repercussions of not properly retaining data for litigation or regulatory investigations. Under the 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), for example, parties can now be sanctioned for discoverable data spoliation or loss.
Alongside the increased use of automated legal holds, the survey found that many corporate legal departments have stopped training their employees on legal processes altogether. A narrow majority of 52% said they trained their employees in 2017, down from 69% in 2016, and 74% in 2015.
Harris noted that companies may be reining in training because they have done enough in past years and “don't have to do as much now.” He also pointed out that as automated software makes it easier to remind data custodians to create and manage legal holds, they might not need as much training as before.
— Rhys Dipshan, Law Technology News
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.