Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Courts

By ljnstaff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 02, 2017

Seventh Circuit Upholds Spoofing Conviction

The first trader charged and convicted under Dodd-Frank's anti-”spoofing” provision lost his appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on Aug. 7. Michael Coscia, 54, was convicted by an Illinois federal jury in November 2015 on six counts of spoofing and six counts of commodities fraud. He was sentenced to three years in prison for perpetrating the bait-and-switch scheme. The Seventh Circuit upheld Coscia's conviction and rejected his arguments against the constitutionality of the anti-spoofing provision.

Spoofing is a method of manipulating future markets by placing large, fake orders intended to deceive other traders into thinking supply or demand for a given commodity has changed. The deception influences prices in a way that benefits smaller, real orders placed by the spoofing trader on the opposite side of the market. Once the price has moved in the direction he wants, the trader cancels the large orders before they can be filled and takes the profits on his smaller orders. The practice was first outlawed by the Dodd-Frank act in 2010 and carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.

At the time of the spoofing in late 2011, Coscia was head of the futures and trading firm Panther Energy Trading LLC. Testimony at his trial showed that he used a sophisticated algorithm to place, cancel and execute orders on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange at the most opportune times. Coscia's algorithm could supposedly cancel large orders one quarter of a second after his smaller order was picked up.

Coscia testified that he had not been deceptive and intended to execute all the orders he placed. He presented evidence showing that 90% of all futures orders are cancelled before they are executed. He also claimed not to have known about Dodd-Frank's prohibition on spoofing, and ended his strategy after just 10 weeks following warnings from exchange regulators.

Prosecutors countered that Coscia frequently placed high-value orders that he later canceled. The designer of Coscia's algorithm programs, Jeremiah Park, testified that Coscia asked him to create programs that would act “like a decoy” and “pump the market.” Prosecutors claimed that Coscia earned $1.4 million by spoofing the soybean, gold, euro and British pound futures market.

On appeal, Coscia argued that Dodd Frank's anti-spoofing provision is unconstitutionally void for vagueness and that he therefore was not given proper notice of the law. He claimed that the use of quotations around the word “spoofing” indicated Congress's mistaken belief that spoofing was an established term of art in the industry. Further, he argued that the nonexistence of an official industry definition coupled with the lack of a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) rule on the subject makes the term indecipherable for the average person. The Seventh Circuit rejected Coscia's arguments outright, pointing to the statute's definition of the term in a parenthetical immediately following the word “spoofing.” The court also said that Coscia's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.

Although it took five years for prosecutors to gain their first spoofing conviction, regulators appear to be targeting perpetrators regularly now. CFTC Enforcement Director Aitan Goelman recently said, “Spoofing is a significant threat to market integrity that the CFTC will continue to vigorously investigate and prosecute.” A British trader, Navinder Sarao, pled guilty to spoofing U.S. futures markets in November 2016, allegedly earning himself $12.8 million in profits. He has not yet been sentenced. In January, Citigroup paid $25 million to settle claims by the CFTC that its traders spoofed U.S. Treasury futures from 2011 to 2012. The CFTC also fined the Japanese Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ $600,000 for the spoofing of U.S. futures markets.

—€ Dennis Mahoney, Mayer Brown

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter? Image

A recent research paper offers up some unexpected results regarding the best ways to manage retirement income.