Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Permission to Post

By Spencer X Smith
September 02, 2017

Like many businesspeople, it didn't take me long to see the value in posting on social media. You and I know our potential clients will look for us on social media before making a phone call or stopping by our offices. What better way is there to stay top of mind with your target audience than to go where they're already paying attention and participate in the conversation?

But still, so many firms play it safe. They'd rather leave their social media profiles blank than post something that could harm the firm's reputation. Noting the potential negative impact of improperly used social media accounts — just look at the reaction to many of President Trump's tweets — firms forbid their staff from posting anything work-related on social media.

Often, they're waiting until they can write a policy that will minimize the potential for corporate embarrassment via social media.

Here's the thing: You don't need a separate policy governing how your firm's staff will represent you on social media. You already have one.

NASA Shows the Way

I recently listened to a podcast featuring John Yembrick, the social media manager at NASA. Yembrick oversees more than 500 NASA-affiliated social media accounts. If any organization was going to face a roadblock to posting on social media, I would have expected it to be NASA.

Yet Yembrick said he had no trouble gaining approval to build out NASA's social media presence, and authorizing hundreds of NASA employees to post on NASA's behalf. If you work at NASA, he said, you already have a NASA email address, a NASA business card, a NASA office phone, and in most cases, a NASA cell phone. The organization already has a detailed communication policy that governs how employees will represent NASA in person, over the phone, and over email.

Your firm's existing communication policy applies to social media too. NASA didn't need to create a separate policy for social media. It simply told its employees to follow the same standards on social media that they follow in any other situations.

Allowing your staff to post on social media on your behalf might feel like a dangerous move. However, at any given moment, any one of your staff could say something in an in-person meeting, or during a speech, or in a mass email that would reflect poorly on the firm. As most policies provide, the firm allows them to speak on your behalf via those platforms because it's crucial to their job and you trust them to represent you well.

Convincing the Firm

So how do you convince a reluctant President or Managing Partner that your firm needs to be on social media? Start by relieving them of the burden of creating a social media policy. Your firm's existing communication policy is enough to guide your staff in posting on any social platform.

Another reason some of the firms I consult with are reluctant to establish a brand presence on social media is because they're fearful of the potential public criticism from dissatisfied clients. That may be true, but just look at the social media accounts of the largest airlines in the U.S., for example.

With frequent weather and technical delays, airlines always face complaints from frustrated customers. But the best brands see the public forum of social media as an opportunity to showcase their outstanding customer service. Instead of only engaging with frustrated customers via private message, proactive brands respond publicly and offer to help, provide an explanation, or correct the situation.

Sure, you'll have interactions with clients who refuse to be satisfied, but your loyal clients watching the exchange can recognize when someone else is being unreasonable. You'll gain more respect when you handle a difficult situation well than if you try to hide the complaints.

Even if you're not on social media, clients will find ways to express their frustration about lackluster experiences they've had with your brand, whether that's on Facebook, on Google Reviews or on their own personal accounts. If you're already on social media, you gain the advantage of being able to respond and potentially convert a dissatisfied client into a delighted client. Start having those conversations in your sandbox instead of all throughout the internet.

How to Respond

As an example, remember the McDonald's “pink slime” issue from a couple years ago? Nope, very few do. They squashed those concerns amazingly quickly by having the conversation in their sandbox. Briefly, the quality of McDonald's meat was questioned, and the moniker “pink slime” was attached to create a tagline to the press circulating the rumors. What did McDonald's do?

Instead of ignoring the rumors, they approached them head-on. They invited everyone into their virtual living room and invited all questions to be answered.

Conclusion

What's the lesson for law firms? Policies that govern your private response to clients are the same ones that should guide your public response. Taking this approach to social media should cross one more thing off your firm's marketing and advertising to-do list. You don't need to write a social media policy because you already have one. So start posting!

*****
Spencer X Smith
is the founder of spencerXsmith.com, instructor at the University of Wisconsin, and Adjunct Faculty at Rutgers University. He may be reached at www.spencerXsmith.com. This article originally appeared in our LJN sibling, Marketing the Law Firm.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.