Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Opioid Addiction Caused By Marketing Misinformation, Plaintiff Argues
Joseph Caltagirone, the father of a young man who died of an accidental methadone overdose after he became addicted to opioids, has appealed the summary dismissal of his case against drugmaker Teva Pharmaceuticals. Caltagirone contends the manufacturer aggressively promoted its fentanyl lozenge product Actiq to physicians as a treatment for a number of ills, even though it was only approved for use by cancer patients and was supposed to be prescribed only by oncologists specially trained in the use of Schedule II opioids. Caltagirone's son was prescribed Actiq for migraine headaches and became addicted. The trial court threw the case out, citing federal preemption and the learned intermediary doctrine. On appeal, attorney Richard Hollawell of the firm of Console & Hollawell asserts in plaintiff's brief that “[t]he law of Pennsylvania is that a jury is to determine whether 'proper and adequate' information has been given by a drug manufacturer to a physician alleged by the defense to be a 'learned intermediary,'” and “[i]t is the defendant manufacturer itself that has misled the intermediary and preserved the causation required to impose liability.”
Woman Fired for Marijuana Use Wins Workplace Discrimination Suit
Christina Barbuto, a woman who was fired from her job by an employer with a zero-tolerance position on drugs, recently prevailed in her discrimination suit before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The court found that Barbuto's former employer, Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC, discriminated against her based on her need to treat her Crohn's disease with marijuana. The company's federal-law argument — that federal law still prohibits the use of marijuana for any reason — failed. The outcome therefore differed from the one obtained by a Colorado employer in a similar case decided in 2015; that state's courts determined that an employer prohibiting any marijuana use was shielded by federal law from liability under state anti-discrimination law.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.