Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last month, we looked at several commonly held beliefs about forensic psychologists and psychiatrists who conduct custody evaluations for the courts. Many of them are not necessarily true. We conclude this discussion herein.
Myth #9: Once an Expert Is Aware of a Bias, the Bias Problem Will Be Attenuated
As a good friend and noted legal scholar, Timothy Tippins, Esq., has often proclaimed in his seminars for lawyers and mental health professionals, “We are walking bags of bias.” True enough for experts of any stripe. However, a common assumption is that if experts just become aware of their biases — if they just develop insight — their effects will be attenuated. The reality: Becoming aware of one's biases as a professional seems, according to the clinical judgment research, to have little or no ameliorative effect on the biases. Getting concrete, corrective feedback about one's judgments and actively implementing concrete steps in the assessment process to dampen the effects of biased attitudes are what is needed (and it is what is very often missing in the practices of custody evaluators).
Implications for Legal Practice
Most of the research behind the assertions offered In Parts One and Two of this article was done in the area of clinical evaluation. Much more research needs to be done, specifically on forensic evaluators. However, the misconceptions about mental health experts listed above are offered as a cautionary tale for lawyers and judges about placing blind trust in testifying experts. They also highlight the wisdom behind legal-procedural basics (cross examination, careful evidentiary gatekeeping, etc) that enshrine the importance of making sure that the information allowed into evidence is sufficiently reliable and not misleading.
Carefully research the expert. Carefully analyze his or her data, method, and reasoning. Verify before trusting. And remember that the errors and weaknesses noted in Parts One and Two of this article are not a function of being an evaluating mental health professional — they are a function of being a member of homo sapiens. However, the misconceptions about mental health experts that we have discussed are a cautionary tale, and the fact that many professionals make such errors does not forgive the fact that they can misdirect the trajectory of a child's life.
*****
Jeffrey P. Wittmann, Ph.D., a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is a licensed psychologist and trial consultant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
A recent research paper offers up some unexpected results regarding the best ways to manage retirement income.