Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Sept. 1, 2017, a split Federal Circuit declined to rehear a panel decision in Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc., Nos. 2015-1470, 2015-1554, 2015-1556, a case that could have significant implications for lost profit damages and apportionment.
Mentor Graphics Corp. (Mentor) and a series of Synopsys entities (Synopsys, Inc., Synopsys Emulation and Verification S.A.S., and EVE-USA, Inc. (collectively, Synopsys)) design and sell emulators to Intel that are used to debug hardware description-level code used for semiconductor fabrication. In litigation in the District of Oregon, Mentor asserted several patents relating to its computer emulator technology against Synopsys, and Synopsys asserted two of its emulator patents against Mentor. See, Mentor Graphics Corp., 851 F.3d 1275, 1280-81 (Fed. Cir. 2017). In a trial on Mentor's U.S. Patent No. 6,240,376 (the '376 patent), the jury found infringement and awarded approximately $36 million in lost profits damages. Both parties appealed various summary judgment and post-trial rulings, including the jury's lost profits award. See, id. at 1281-84. Among other things, Synopsys argued that the damages award should be vacated because it was not apportioned. See, id. at 1283.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.