Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Because there are so many new digital channels for possible intellectual property infringement, knowledge of the various mechanisms available to combat the issue is vital to enabling entertainment industry owners to protect their brand.
As many entertainment companies and entertainers know, domain names present an easy opportunity for infringement. Cybersquatters register domains containing a trademark, or similar to a trademark, for the purpose of selling that domain to the trademark owner for a high price. A variety of “top level domains” (i.e., .com, .org, .net) enable such cybersquatters to buy domains corresponding to trademarks with the intent of profiting off the infringement. In recent years, the expansion of “generic top level domains” (gTLDs) — which range from “.college” and “.dog” to “.porn” and “.sucks” — have opened the door for cybersquatters to seize hundreds of new domains containing trademarks. (A list of these new gTLDs, approved by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), can be found at https://go.icann.org/2fvWNKf.)
Fortunately, there are ways to both prevent and combat a cybersquatter purchasing the domain “yourtrademark.sucks.” Proactive measures can be taken through registration of a federally protected trademark with the Trademark Clearinghouse, a centralized database for trademarks used in the new gTLDs. Registration with the clearinghouse allows a mark holder to register for a domain in a new gTLD during that gTLD's “sunrise period” — a gTLD's initial 30 days, during which only trademark owners can register for domains matching their mark.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.