Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

BankruptcyFeaturesLJN NewslettersThe Bankruptcy Strategist

Third Circuit Defines 'Received' for Section 503(B)(9) Claims

By Anthony Michael Sabino
October 02, 2017

For over a decade now, the Bankruptcy Code has granted a priority of payment with regard to creditor claims for goods received by the debtor in the 20 days before bankruptcy. The law is prosaic enough on its face; a creditor merely needs to demonstrate that the debtor “received” the goods within the prescribed pre-bankruptcy interval, and its claim attains priority as an administrative expense. 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9). Ah, but therein lies the rub.

Precisely, what constitutes “received” by the debtor in this context? Does it mean actual physical custody of the goods? Or is the mere transfer of legal title sufficient to qualify for such improved status? Last year, we expounded upon a decision that denied administrative expense status to a claim because the district court held that “received” includes the passing of title. See Abatemarco & Sabino, “Bankruptcy Code, International Trade Treaty Collide over Expense Status,” (October, 2016; http://bit.ly/2fay1iU). Truth be told, this writer agreed with the outcome, albeit for somewhat different reasons. Indeed, aware that the lower court decision was being appealed, we urged clarification from a higher court.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.