Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For over a decade now, the Bankruptcy Code has granted a priority of payment with regard to creditor claims for goods received by the debtor in the 20 days before bankruptcy. The law is prosaic enough on its face; a creditor merely needs to demonstrate that the debtor “received” the goods within the prescribed pre-bankruptcy interval, and its claim attains priority as an administrative expense. 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9). Ah, but therein lies the rub.
Precisely, what constitutes “received” by the debtor in this context? Does it mean actual physical custody of the goods? Or is the mere transfer of legal title sufficient to qualify for such improved status? Last year, we expounded upon a decision that denied administrative expense status to a claim because the district court held that “received” includes the passing of title. See Abatemarco & Sabino, “Bankruptcy Code, International Trade Treaty Collide over Expense Status,” (October, 2016; http://bit.ly/2fay1iU). Truth be told, this writer agreed with the outcome, albeit for somewhat different reasons. Indeed, aware that the lower court decision was being appealed, we urged clarification from a higher court.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.