Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ljnstaff
November 02, 2017

NEW YORK

Man Who Lied About His Role As Government Agent Is Sentenced

On Oct. 5, 2017, Malcolm Harris (“Harris”), a New York City resident, was sentenced to 3½ years in prison for his role in an attempted bribery scheme after pleading guilty to one count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering in June. Harris was originally charged in the Southern District of New York with two co-defendants in December 2016. His co-defendants are awaiting trial and are both charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), three counts of violating the FCPA, one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, and one count of money laundering.

The bribery plot commenced in March 2013, when Ban Ki Sang (“Sang”), an executive at Keangnam Enterprises Co. Ltd. (“Keangnam”), a construction company in South Korea, sought to sell a skyscraper in Hanoi, Vietnam. As Keangnam was faced with a liquidity crisis, Sang convinced the company to enter into an agreement with his son, Joo Hyun Bhan (“Bhan”), and his real estate firm to sell the complex, Landmark 72. According to Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's New York Field Office, William F. Sweeney Jr., “instead of lawfully obtaining financing for the deal, [Sang and Bhan] allegedly entered into an illegal agreement with Harris to bribe a foreign official into purchasing the property.”

Sang and Bahn approached Harris, whom they believed to have connections with officials in a Middle Eastern government, and agreed to pay him a $500,000 up-front fee — with an additional $2 million due at closing — for arranging the sale of Landmark 72 to the unnamed country's sovereign wealth fund. San Woo (“Woo”), also charged in the case, assisted Sang and Bahn in securing funds for the $500,000 bribe.

Harris, who had no connection to any Middle Eastern government, falsified emails and text messages from government officials agreeing to the transaction. Rather than funneling the bribe payment to the foreign government as promised, Harris pocketed the funds for his own use, spending it on a lavish condo in Brooklyn, NY. In turn, Bahn lied to Keangnam and its creditors by forging emails and documents, regarding the sovereign wealth fund's interest in the property. The purported sale was for $800 million, from which Bahn would receive a multimillion dollar commission through his exclusive brokerage agreement with Keangnam.

Colleen Snow, Mayer Brown

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.