Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Increased Scrutiny for <i>Cy Pres</i> Provisions in Class Action Settlements

By Joshua L. Becker and Brad M. Strickland
November 02, 2017

Editor's note: Lawsuits against pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers often come in the form of class actions, and sometimes the settlement or award amount exceeds the identified class members' claim amounts. In such cases, the excess funds may be distributed to a cy pres recipient, but courts are starting to question such moves more thoroughly.

One of the critical issues addressed in a class action settlement is how the settlement funds are to be distributed. A popular method of doing this is to have a portion of the settlement fund made as a cy pres payment for the benefit of the class members. The term “cy pres” derives from the French expression “ cy pres comme possible,” meaning “as near as possible.” In the context of class actions, a cy pres distribution attempts to put settlement funds to their next-best use when, for one of a number of reasons, it is difficult to distribute all settlement funds to individual class members.

While cy pres distributions are generally provided for in the settlement agreement, the court may order excess funds to be paid to a cy pres recipient. Thus, the cy pres doctrine typically is applied in one of three situations:

  1. when the parties agree that if a fixed settlement fund exceeds the amount paid (because too few class members register as claimants), then the excess funds are to be used to make cy pres payments;
  2. when the parties agree that the entirety of the settlement funds are to be paid pursuant to the cy pres doctrine; or
  3. when the court decides that administering a settlement by paying class members directly would be too expensive or burdensome.
  4. When cy pres payments are included by the parties in the settlement agreement, the parties may specify which charitable entities will receive the funds or they may leave the specific charities to be decided by the court at a later time, although the latter choice may be becoming a risky practice.

Courts used to routinely approve cy pres provisions. Indeed, these payments have several benefits:

  1. they create donations to worthy causes;
  2. they diminish the risk of objectors;
  3. they reduce potential notice and claims administration costs and may provide tax benefits for defendants;
  4. they increase contingent fee awards for plaintiffs; and
  5. they allow for easier administration of settlement payments for the court.

Despite the popularity of utilizing the cy pres doctrine and its benefits, courts are reviewing class action settlement agreements that provide for cy pres payments with increased scrutiny, particularly in the percentage of funds distributed pursuant to the cy pres doctrine and the nexus between the underlying action and the cy pres recipient.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.