Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Retention of Tenant's Check in Lockbox
Scarborough Manor Owners Corp. v. Robson
NYLJ 9/11/17, p. 21, col. 4
AppTerm, 9th and 10th Districts
(memorandum opinion)
In co-op corporation's summary holdover proceeding against a proprietary lessee, the latter appealed from Justice Court's award of possession to landlord. The Appellate Term affirmed, holding that landlord had not waived its right to terminate by accepting rent from tenant.
Co-op corporation brought the holdover proceeding alleging that proprietary lessee had failed to maintain her unit in accordance with house rules and the provisions of the proprietary lease. At a nonjury trial, tenant moved to dismiss, alleging that landlord had accepted rent for the month after the co-op corporation's termination of the proprietary lease and before the co-op commenced the summary proceeding. Although the co-op board had instructed the managing agent not to accept rent from proprietary lessee, she nevertheless deposited a rent check into a bank lockbox. Proprietary lessee contended that the co-op had therefore accepted the rent and waived its right to terminate or, in the alternative, had accepted the rent and established a month-to-month tenancy, which would require landlord to serve a new 30-day notice. Justice Court rejected these arguments and entered a judgment of possession for the co-op corporation.
In affirming, the Appellate Term concluded that landlord had taken no action that constituted a knowing waiver of its right to terminate the lease. The court also held that because neither the co-op corporation nor its managing agent knew of proprietary lessee's deposit of the rent check, the co-op corporation had not accepted the rent check. As a result, no month-to-month tenancy had been established.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.