Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

CybersecurityFeaturesGeneral Counsel and In House CounselTechnology Media and TelecomLJN NewslettersCybersecurity Law & Strategy

Regulators Are Catching Up to Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology within the Financial Services Industry

By Craig Nazzaro, Brad Rustin and John Jennings
December 01, 2017

As we head into 2018, cryptocurrency and blockchain will continue to be a top initiative for pioneers in the financial services industry. Within financial services, this space includes everyone from those looking to issue a new cryptocurrency, FinTech firms looking to disrupt the financial services industry though creative uses and implementation of the technology, and banks and non-bank lenders of all sizes looking to see how they can best utilize the technology to cut costs and drive advancements in service. As with any innovation within the financial services industry, the regulators are never far behind and are doing their best to keep up. Those that enter this space will find that they also have to pioneer the controls to manage the regulatory risks this technology presents.

For the benefit of the uninitiated, cryptocurrencies, also known as “virtual currency,” such as the well-known “BitCoin” and “Ethereum,” are the results of just one application of blockchain technology. One should not visualize cryptocurrencies as actual currency or legal tender (we discuss why below). Instead, think of cryptocurrency as a means of utilizing the underlying blockchain technology to create a “store of value.” Anything that can function as a vehicle to save, house, move and maintain value and/or wealth can be utilized as a “store of value.” For example, gold, silver, real estate, diamonds, fine art and stocks are all “stores of value.” Viewing cryptocurrency in this manner will enable you to understand its regulation within the financial services industry.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.