Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
RICO Suit Cites 'Weinstein Sexual Enterprise'
Add this to the growing list of legal problems facing Harvey Weinstein, The Weinstein Co. (TWC) and Miramax: Lawyers at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and The Armenta Law Firm have filed a federal racketeering class action against Weinstein, the production company and the studio alleging they conspired “to facilitate and conceal [Weinstein's] pattern of unwanted sexual conduct.”
The law firms filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of a Jane Doe plaintiff who claims Weinstein threatened her and falsely imprisoned her after she refused his advances after being brought in to audition for a Miramax production. Jane Doe v. Miramax LLC, 2:2017cv08323.
The lawyers are seeking to certify a class of all women who met with Weinstein in person to audition or to discuss involvement in a project to be produced or distributed by Miramax or TWC.
“Plaintiff, and hundreds of other female actors like her, found themselves with Weinstein on the casting couch at offices, in hotel rooms, or at rooms at industry functions,” the lawyers wrote. “Weinstein's widespread sexual misconduct did not occur without the help of others. Rather, over time, Weinstein enlisted the aid of other firms and individuals to facilitate and conceal his pattern of unwanted sexual conduct.”
Representatives of Miramax and TWC didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
The 59-page complaint draws heavily on recent reporting by The New York Times and The New Yorker. The lawsuit labels investigative firms and lawyers who helped suppress stories about Weinstein as “The Weinstein Sexual Enterprise.” Law firms mentioned in the complaint include law firms Boies Schiller Flexner; K&L Gates; BCL Burton Copeland; and Gross, Kleinhendler, Hodak, Halevy, Greenberg & Co., though the suit is not seeking any claims against lawyers or firms.
In a statement provided by a firm spokesman, Boies Schiller Flexner general counsel Nicholas Gravante Jr. said his firm had recently been asked by Benjamin Brafman, one of Weinstein's current defense counsel, not to make any public statements about him or the firm's representation of him. “Pending further discussions, we are, at present, obliged to respect that request,” Gravante said. Representatives from the other law firms were not immediately available for comment.
However, the lawsuit claims TWC and Miramax should be held liable for Weinstein's actions because the conduct was within the scope of his employment for the companies.
*****
Ross Todd is bureau chief of The Recorder, a San Francisco-based ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.