Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Permanent Injunction Against Former Commodores' Member over Use of Group's Name
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a Florida federal district court's grant of a permanent injunction in favor of The Commodores music group barring former member Thomas McClary from using the band name. Commodores Entertainment Corp. v. McClary, 6:14-cv-01335. McClary left The Commodores in 1984, but in recent years toured as “Commodores Featuring Thomas McClary” and “The 2014 Commodores.” The group's general partnership agreement stated: “Upon the death or withdrawal of less than a majority of the Partners, the remaining majority of the Partners shall continue to have the right to use the Group Name for any purpose.” In the band's trademark suit against McClary, the appeals court found: “[T]he unrefuted record can lead only to the reasonable conclusion that McClary lacked control over the musical venture known as 'The Commodores' after he left the band to pursue his solo career. In the period after he left the band, save two performances as a fill-in guitarist in 2010, he did not meet with the other members of the group to rehearse or perform. He did not join the group to make business decisions about performance schedules or recordings. He stopped writing songs with the group. He was not involved with the group's decisions about performances, whether about the songs to be performed, the personnel to be involved, or the production details of the shows. The rights to use the name 'The Commodores' remained with the group after McClary departed, and the corollary is also true: McClary did not retain rights to use the marks individually.”
Federal Court Ruling in Trademark Battle over “Row”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?