Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
NEW YORK
Keppel Settles Bribery Charges in the U.S.,
Singapore, and Brazil
Keppel Offshore & Marine Ltd. (“Keppel”), a Singapore-based offshore oil and gas rig company, and its wholly owned United States subsidiary, Keppel Offshore & Marine USA Inc. (“Keppel USA”), agreed to pay a $422 million penalty to the United States, Brazil and Singapore related to illegal payments made to officials in Brazil. Keppel will pay $105 million related to the United States (to include $4.7 million paid by Keppel USA), $211 million in criminal penalties to the Ministério Público Federal in Brazil, and $105 million in penalties to the Attorney General's Chambers in Singapore. To the extent Keppel does not pay the full amounts to Brazilian and Singapore enforcement authorities, the balance is to be paid to the United States Treasury.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?