Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A woman who fell and injured herself while attending a country music concert at Monmouth University cannot sue the school for damages, a New Jersey appeals court ruled in a divided decision that potentially sets the case up to be heard by the state Supreme Court.
Even though the non-profit university made money by hosting the concert by country music star Martina McBride, the school still is immune from lawsuit under the state's Charitable Immunity Act (CIA), and the show was a “cultural and educational” experience, a 2-1 Appellate Division majority decided. Green v. Monmouth University, A-1652-15T2.
The university wasn't the hiring concert promoter but sold tickets for the McBride concert at the box office for its Multipurpose Activity Center (MAC), where the show took place. The university also had a right to share in merchandise and a $3.00 per-ticket facility fee.
The CIA, N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-7, states in part: “No nonprofit corporation, society or association organized exclusively for religious, charitable or educational purposes or its trustees, directors, officers, employees, agents, servants or volunteers shall, except as is hereinafter set forth, be liable to respond in damages to any person who shall suffer damage from the negligence of any agent or servant of such corporation, society or association, where such person is a beneficiary, to whatever degree, of the works of such nonprofit corporation, society or association ….”
“Indeed, providing concerts open to the public is one of the stated purposes of the university,” Appellate Division Judge George Leone wrote for the court majority. He was joined by Judge Mitchel Ostrer.
Appellate Division Judge Clarkson Fisher Jr. dissented, saying a for-profit concert did not serve the university's charitable purpose.
The plaintiff, Frances Green, was injured on Dec. 9, 2012, when she slipped and fell on a flight of stairs while attending the McBride Christmas concert at the MAC. She sued the school, but Monmouth County Superior Court Judge Katie Gummer, citing the Charitable Immunity Act dismissed the lawsuit on summary judgment. Green appealed.
The appellate majority upheld Judge Gummer's ruling, saying that in enacting the CIA, the state legislature meant for the law to be read liberally to offer immunity in as many cases as possible. “Although not a classical musician, McBride is an American country music performer,” Appellate Judge Leon wrote. “Whether classical, country or Christmas, music is an art, and McBride is a musical artist. Thus, McBride's concert was a 'cultural and educational experience for patrons of this form of artistic production'” he noted, citing the Appellate Division's ruling in Lax v. Princeton University, 343 N.J. Super. 568 (2001).
“The university did not lose its charitable immunity by renting the [Multipurpose Activity Center] to host the McBride concert,” Judge Leone added. “By attending, [Green] and the other members of the audience were beneficiaries of the educational offering by the university.”
Appellate Judge Fisher countered in dissent, “I see no educational purpose of endeavor here.” “The university saw a way to generate income when its [MAC] was unused,” he added.
Green was represented by Stewart Leviss, of Roseland, NJ's Berkowitz, Lichtstein, Kuritsky, Giasullo & Gross. John Kaelin III, of the Mount Laurel, NJ, office of Haddix & Associates, represented Monmouth University.
Because the Appellate Division panel was split, the case is appealable as of right to the state Supreme Court.
*****
Michael Booth writes for the New Jersey Law Journal, an ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance. He can be reached at [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.