Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the Courts
Royal Dutch Shell and Eni Head to Trial over Nigeria Corruption Allegations
Since 2014, oil and gas companies Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Eni SpA have been investigated by authorities in Italy, the Netherlands, and Nigeria regarding alleged significant payments to secure a billion-dollar deal involving one of Nigeria's largest untapped oil fields. On Dec. 20, 2017, a judge in Milan, Italy, accepted charges both for Shell and Eni, as well as Eni's CEO and a number of current and former employees of both companies, to stand trial beginning March 5, 2018. While anti-corruption investigations are not uncommon in the oil and gas industry, such a trial is rare and could be precedent-setting.
Italian prosecutors have been working to build a case related to the acquisition of a deepwater oil-prospecting license by the companies in 2011. Prosecutors allege that Eni and Shell paid almost $1.1 billion into a Nigerian government escrow account, part of which was later said to be distributed amongst Nigerian officials as payoffs for the deal. In December 2017, the Milan prosecutor alleged that at least $520 million was converted to cash and intended to be paid to the then Nigerian president, a former oil minister, and other Nigerian officials.
Shell and Eni will face charges in relation to certain Italian administrative bribery offenses, unless the companies can prove they had adequate anti-corruption compliance procedures in place. Both companies have consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with the deal. Shell has indicated that it has cooperated with “relevant authorities,” and reports indicate that the company had provided authorities with the findings from an internal investigation carried out by Debevoise & Plimpton.
Individuals who will also stand trial include Eni's current CEO Claudio Descalzi, former CEO Paolo Scaroni, former Shell executives Malcom Brinded and Peterson Robinson, and former Shell employee Guy Colegate. Charges against these individuals were first announced in October 2017. All individuals have denied the charges, and Eni has expressed that it has “full confidence” that its CEO Descalzi was not involved in the conduct alleged by prosecutors.
Shell has also expressed support for its former employees, stating, “We are disappointed by the outcome of the preliminary hearing and the decision to indict Shell and its former employees. We believe the trial judges will conclude that there is no case against Shell or its former employees.”
The average trial length in Italy is over a year — stretching 460 days in 2016, according to the Italian Ministry of Justice. A final court ruling in this case may take years, according to media reports and Italian legal observers. Shell and Eni's ongoing legal exposure also extends beyond Italy to the Netherlands and Nigeria. A related Dutch investigation is also continuing, and Dutch authorities have reportedly provided assistance to the Italian investigation — including conducting an earlier raid on Shell in The Hague in response to a request from Italian authorities. In Nigeria, where the companies are also facing criminal charges, authorities allege that Shell and Eni paid $801 million USD to certain officials to obtain a license for the oil field.
— Michael Stanek, Mayer Brown
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.