Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Another Virtual Currency Player Charged with Fraud by CFTC
On the heels of two enforcement actions announced in the first weeks of January, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced fraud charges against yet another company operating in the virtual currency space. The enforcement action alleges that Las Vegas-based My Big Coin Pay Inc., a virtual currency wallet and platform, misappropriated more than $6 million from its customers for “personal expenses and the purchase of luxury goods,” including a home, jewelry and fine art. “As a result, MBC customers have lost most, if not all, of their funds due to defendants' fraud and misappropriation,” the commission's Jan. 16 complaint filed in Massachusetts federal court reads. The complaint was shared publicly by the CFTC after a period of being under seal.
My Big Coin allegedly misled customers by telling them the company was being actively traded on multiple currency exchanges and by falsifying trading price reports. The company told customers it was backed by gold, which the CFTC says it was not. “In reality, the supposed trading results were illusory, and any payouts of funds to MBC customers were derived from funds fraudulently obtained from other MBC customers in the manner of a Ponzi scheme,” the lawsuit states. My Big Coin also lied to customers about a partnership with Mastercard Inc. that would allow customers to use the currency wherever Mastercard is accepted, according to the suit.
A representative from My Big Coin did not immediately respond for comment on the allegations.
The CFTC's complaint and a restraining order were issued by a judge from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The order froze the assets of the company and its executives, Randall Crater of East Hampton, NY and Mark Gillespie of Hartland, MI.
“As this case shows, the CFTC is actively policing the virtual currency markets and will vigorously enforce the antifraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act,” Director of Enforcement James McDonald said in a press release. “In addition to harming customers, fraud in connection with virtual currencies inhibits potentially market-enhancing developments in this area.” He cautioned potential customers in the red-hot virtual currency market to “engage in appropriate diligence” before buying in.
The year is young, but the order makes the third action the CFTC has taken in 2018 against a company running a virtual currency scheme.
Dina Ellis Rochkind, of counsel at Paul Hastings, who is not involved in this case, says she expects to see more virtual currency enforcement actions coming from both the CFTC and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “They are very concerned about retail investors who are active in the crypto space,” Rochkind said in an email. “They are also concerned about a potential market crash. The plaintiff's bar has also become more active. That being said, I believe the SEC and CFTC are supporters of crypto, blockchain and ICOs that are operating legally.”
She added: “From a big picture standpoint, Treasury, FinCen and The Hill are becoming more active on this issue because of concerns about money laundering and terrorist financing. … I think agencies like Treasury, Homeland Security, etc. are a greater threat to cryptocurrencies than the SEC and CFTC who are looking to protect investors while legitimizing the industry.”
*****
Stephanie Forshee writes for the New York Law Journal, an ALM sibling of this newsletter..
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.