Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

IP News

By Jeff Ginsberg and David Cooperberg
March 01, 2018

Federal Circuit Vacates Noninfringement Decision Finding a Genuine Dispute as to Divided Infringement

On Dec. 19, 2017, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Lourie, O'Malley, and Taranto issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge O'Malley, in Travel Sentry, Inc. v. David A. Tropp, Case Nos. 2016-2386, 2016-2387, 2016-2714, and 2017-1025. The panel vacated the district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement, finding a genuine factual dispute as to whether Travel Sentry directs or controls the performance of certain steps of the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,021,537 (the '537 patent) and 7,036,728 (the '728 patent) issued to appellant David A. Tropp.

The Federal Circuit identified claim 1 of the '537 patent as representative. This claim recites a four step method of improving airline luggage inspection by a luggage screening entity, comprising:

[a] making available to consumers [luggage with] a special lock having a combination lock portion and a … master key lock portion for receiving a master key …, the special lock also having an identification structure … that matches an identification structure previously provided to the luggage screening entity …, [b] marketing the special lock to the consumers …, [c] the identification structure signaling to a … luggage screening entity … that [it] has agreed to subject the special lock [to a] special procedure …, and [d] the luggage screening entity acting pursuant to a prior agreement to look for the identification structure while screening luggage and …, to use the master key … to, if necessary, open the … luggage.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?