Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most readers of this publication today are faced with making business decisions in the face of vast cybersecurity risks. They must act defensively and understand more than just what software is available to prevent or repair an ambush. If law firms want to prevent crime, they must recognize their vulnerabilities and the associated liabilities. As one conference in London marketed the concern, “No Cybersecurity, No Clients.”
Armed with technical and regulatory weapons for preventing cyber crimes, law firms must administer policies to protect client data and use the systems and services held standard by industries like medicine and banking. No one knows when disruption will take place. New methods of adverse action force executives to make more choices and decisions. All departments must merge their vigilance and join with IT services as IT takes center stage in order to stay prepared.
Hiring the right people is a place to begin, but this is also a formidable task in a fast-paced risk environment. It is more difficult than ever to evaluate the credentials of new hires on the basis merely of where they worked or trained. Their focus, if not their training, must be very current. An IT staff member trained in network administration still needs regular briefing on the broader technical field. In every area of practice, whether tax or IP, the challenge is to keep up with IT advances and changes once school is out, the job search ends, and real work begins.
Andrew Jurczyk, CIO at Seyfarth Shaw LLP in Chicago, has spent three decades in law firm technology. He has a healthy perspective on the challenges law firms face in cybersecurity since he first faced post-9/11 risk management. In executive management at a major firm, Jurczyk also sees many substantive changes today in the way managers must work with technical staff. More people work from home, for example, and staff are spread across the country or world. In the risk environment, education of a Cybersecurity Specialist never ends.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?