Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Basics When Reviewing a Real Estate Tax Provision

By Mark Morfopoulos
March 01, 2018

Real estate tax provisions usually provide that a tenant will pay either its proportionate share of all real estate taxes or the proportionate share of all such real estate taxes that are in excess of real estate taxes assessed against a property in a predetermined base tax year. There are several clauses, however, that rarely find their way into a landlord's initial draft of the lease that may be beneficial to a tenant. In addition, certain real estate tax provisions that are typically included in a landlord's standard lease form need to be carefully reviewed to make sure they are fair to both the landlord and the tenant.

|

Base Tax Year

Even if the letter of intent mirrors what is in the lease, it may still be proper for a tenant to at least question the base year dates in a lease. The basic concept is that the tenant should be in possession of the space without being liable for the payment of taxes for at least one year. In many leases, the base year occurs on a much earlier date. For example, if the base year in a lease is the fiscal year 2017-2018 and the tenant will not be taking possession until June of 2018, the base year would start approximately one year before the date that the tenant takes possession of the premises and would require the tenant to start paying taxes much sooner than the date the tenant intended that such taxes would be paid. It may be easy to overlook this issue, but when the tenant gets a tax bill that is due and payable even before it opens for business, it may be an unwelcome surprise.

|

Defining Real Estate Taxes

It is also important not to gloss over the definition of “real estate taxes” in the tax provision. First, a tenant should check if the tax block and lot accurately describe the building or the property that is being leased. To avoid uncertainty, do not rely on the street address alone to describe the property. Second, if you are leasing space in a condominium, in most cases, the tenant should only be paying for the taxes assessed against the condo unit, not the entire building. Third, although some leases exclude certain items from being included as a real estate tax, most do not go far enough in this endeavor. For example, if the landlord incurs fines, fees or penalties when it pays real estate taxes, the tenant should not be responsible for such payments unless the tenant is also delinquent in its payment of such taxes to the landlord. In addition, many tenants attempt to exclude special assessments or taxes resulting from the future expansion of the building or from any improvements exclusively made by and for the benefit of any other tenant in the premises. If a tenant does not exclude these items, they will be included as part of real estate taxes and the tenant will be paying some or all of these potentially objectionable charges.

|

Capping Real Estate Taxes

Depending on the bargaining position of the parties, a tenant may be able to negotiate a provision that caps the amount of real estate taxes that will be charged to a tenant in any given year. This provides a greater degree of certainty to a tenant that the costs of leasing its space will not soar out of control. These provisions are never in any landlord's “standard form of lease.” If a tenant does not specifically negotiate such a cap, it will not be included in the lease.

|

Paying Special Assessments In Installments

Most initial drafts of a lease prepared by a landlord provide that the tenant will pay either a percentage of assessments or a percentage of assessments charged to the landlord over a base year. A tenant may claim that this requirement is unfair because an assessment could be imposed at the end of the lease term. In such a case, the tenant — who may only be enjoying the benefit of the assessment for a short period of time — will be required to pay for 100% of the cost of the assessment even though the assessment may be benefiting future tenants (who will not be paying for any of the cost of such assessment) and the landlord for a far longer period of time. A fair solution to this problem is to insert a clause in the lease that states:

If, by law, any assessment may be paid in installments, then, for the purposes of the lease: a) such assessment shall be deemed to have been payable in the maximum number of installments permitted by law; and b) there shall be included in “real estate taxes”, for each year in which such installments may be paid, the installments of such assessments so becoming payable during such year, together with interest payable during such year.

Most landlords will agree to such a provision.

|

Contesting Real Estate Taxes

Landlords usually prohibit tenants from having the right to contest real estate taxes. In the case where a tenant is paying a substantial portion of real estate taxes, however, many tenants insist that the tenant have the right to contest such taxes if the landlord decides not to do so. A typical provision that permits a tenant to contest taxes is as follows:

Landlord shall not be required to contest the validity of the assessment, valuation and/or Real Estate Taxes in any fiscal year if Landlord's tax certiorari consultants shall advise Landlord in any particular tax year(s) that a tax contest in such year(s) would likely be unsuccessful or detrimental to the real estate taxes imposed against the Building and land under said Building in the short or long term. In addition, Landlord shall have the right, but not the obligation, to contest the amount or validity of any assessment, valuation and/or Real Estate Taxes in any fiscal year during the demised term of this Lease, failing which, Tenant shall have the right to contest the assessment, valuation and/or Real Estate Taxes by appropriate proceedings conducted in good faith, provided Tenant at least thirty (30) days prior has requested Landlord to make such a contest and Landlord or other tenants have not then previously filed or do not thereafter within said thirty (30) days file a contest of the amount or validity of specific Real Estate Taxes which are payable by Tenant, Tenant will have the right, at Tenant's expense, to contest the amount or validity of Real Estate Taxes by appropriate administrative and legal proceedings brought in Tenant's name by counsel selected and engaged by Tenant. Landlord will execute and deliver to Tenant whatever documents may be reasonably necessary or proper to permit Tenant to contest Real Estate Taxes or which may be necessary to secure payment of any refund which may result from any such proceedings.

|

Conclusion

Although there are a number of other issues that can come up when reviewing a real estate tax provision, even if a tenant only adds the above items to its leasing checklist and considers these issues every time it negotiates a lease, it could result in a substantial reduction in the amount of real estate taxes that a tenant will end up paying.

***** Mark Morfopoulos, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is an attorney in the real estate department of Wachtel Missry LLP. Reach him at [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.