Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Intellectual PropertyCopyrightsFeaturesLitigationTechnology Media and TelecomThe Intellectual Property Strategist

Walking the Fine Line of Fair Use: The Second Circuit's Decision in <i>Fox News v. TVEyes</i>

By Crystal Genteman and Chris Bussert
April 01, 2018

When the police release an important public safety message, how do they monitor the reporting of that message on TV news broadcasts? Or if a manufacturer issues a product recall, how can it view all news broadcasts commenting on the recall and track the geographic locations in which recall coverage has aired? Many people likely assume that the answer is the Internet. But they would be wrong: only a small fraction of television news broadcasts are made available online. For a party to monitor and view all news coverage of an event, it would essentially have to watch and record all news broadcasts 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

That's exactly what media-monitoring service TVEyes did. Specifically, TVNews recorded the broadcasts of 1,400 television and radio stations full-time and then compiled that content into a searchable database using closed captioning and speech-to-text technology. TVEyes then offered its subscribers — which were only businesses and not the general public — the ability to search all news broadcasts in the last thirty-two days via keyword to identify and view relevant 10-minute news clips referencing that keyword. Through the TVEyes service, subscribers could not only view the clips, they could also see the market viewership of each clip based on Nielson ratings, generate maps plotting the geographic locations where the content had been viewed, and create graphics showing the frequency of the viewings. In addition, subscribers could archive, edit, download, and even email the clips. Among TVEyes's subscribers were the White House, the United States Army and Marines, 100 current members of Congress, the Department of Defense, the Associated Press, the American Red Cross, AARP, Reuters, various police departments, and the Association of Trial Lawyers.

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.