Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
May 01, 2018

 

Rule 12(b)(6) Motion Denied in Infringement Dispute over Anastasia Musical, Due to “Lengthy Historical Record” Involving Central Character

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied a pre-trial defense request to end a copyright infringement suit brought over the recent Broadway musical Anastasia. Becdelievre v. Anastasia Musical LLC, 16 Civ. 9471 (S.D.N.Y. 2018).

Anastasia was the youngest daughter of Russia's last imperial ruler. There had long been a mystery as to whether she survived the 1918 murder of her family during the communist revolution. The plaintiffs own the copyrights to a 1940s play about Anastasia by French playwright Marcelle Maurette and a 1952 English version by Guy Bolton. The defendants produced the Broadway musical Anastasia, written by co-defendant Terrance McNally. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein noted, “This case presents a relatively simple copyright dispute, but one that is complicated by a lengthy historical record.” The district court's ruling focused on a judge's role when defendants file a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted” in a copyright infringement case involving “a lengthy historical record.” District Judge Hellerstein explained that the defendants want “me to make this comparison [as to whether there is substantially similar between the musical and the plaintiffs' works] before Answers are filed, and without guidance by experts. I am unable to make such a complicated comparison. In order to do so, I would need to take judicial notice of facts said to be historical — an inappropriate exercise. I would also have to analyze similarities and differences among different literary expressions. The complaint is well-pleaded, and not dismissable on motion.” The district judge added: “But even accepting defendants' description of the historical record on its face and dismissing it from the analysis, the two works share significant commonalities not traced to any documented historical record.” The district court emphasized: “Defendants rely heavily on the fact that the Play and Musical are different in 'total concept and feel.' … True, one is a musical and one is a play, and the two works thus are of different genres. Also, the Musical is more comical, light-hearted, and set at a faster pace than the Play, which is slower, dramatic, and takes place largely in a single set. However, it is arguable that the 'total concept and feel' [test] differs materially beyond the fact that one is a musical and the other, a play.” And District Judge Hellerstein pointed to the Second Circuit's view that “[t]he total concept and feel test … is simply not helpful in analyzing works that, because of their different genres and media, must necessarily have a different concept and feel.”

*****

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?