Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Settlement proceeds from a writers' dispute involving the film Olympus Has Fallen must be further divided pursuant to one of the writer's divorce agreements, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled. Bausch v. Green, 18-0463.
A unanimous three-judge panel of the court decided that screenwriter John Green, who co-wrote the 2013 thriller starring Gerard Butler, Aaron Eckhart, Morgan Freeman and others, needed to halve the $175,000 he received from a settlement agreement with his former writing partner, who had marketed and sold the script allegedly without Green's knowledge. The ruling affirmed a decision from the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas.
Green argued his former wife, Jessica Bausch, was not entitled to the money because their divorce agreement did not cover lawsuit proceeds that may be realized after the marriage. But the Superior Court panel, led by Judge Victor Stabile said the proceeds were essentially the result of a sale. “The trial court found that the script was sold for $175,000. The record, indeed [Green's] trial testimony, confirms those facts. Subsequent to that sale, [Green] relinquished any rights to the movie produced from the script,” Stabile said. “The [divorce agreement] does not specify which party had to sell the script, nor does the [divorce agreement] define proceeds.”
According to Judge Stabile, Green and Bausch married in 1997, and finalized their divorce in 2005. In 2003, they entered into a property settlement agreement that said, among other things, that if Green “receives any monies or other proceeds from the sale of that certain motion picture script entitled 'Olympus Is Fallen,' husband shall promptly pay one-half of the Olympus proceeds to [Bausch].”
Judge Stabile said that Green, along with his former writing partner Creighton Rothenberger, had written a script that they titled Olympus Is Fallen. After their business partnership ended, Rothenberger marketed and sold the script, allegedly without Green's knowledge, Judge Stabile said. In 2013, Green learned that their script had been used as the basis for Olympus Has Fallen.
Green and Rothenberger litigated the rights to the movie script in California court, and, according to Judge Stabile, Green testified that the script Rothenberger sold in 2012 had been heavily edited and revised. The parties, however, settled the dispute, with Green receiving a total of $194,687, including $175,000 in exchange for his rights to the film.
After Bausch sought her portion of the proceeds under their agreement, Green contended that, because the script had been sold by a third party, his agreement with Bausch did not cover the lawsuit proceeds. He further contended that the Domestic Relations Code does not include payment for a lawsuit that occurred after the parties' separation.
The Pennsylvania Superior Court, however, said Green did not cite any law saying that the Domestic Relations Code does not allow a spouse to recover proceeds from property that otherwise falls under the parties' property agreement. “Appellant invites us to conclude that [Bausch's] right to her share under the [agreement] depended on Rothenberger's voluntary compliance with that agreement,” the superior court said. “That appellant and Rothenberger proceeded to litigation does not change the fact that the agreement and release compensated appellant for Rothenberger's sale of the script.”
Green's attorney is Michael Alan Siddons of Media, PA. Bausch's attorney is Thomas Myers Jr. of Paoli, PA.
*****
Max Mitchell is a reporter for The Legal Intelligencer, the Philadelphia-based ALM sibling publication of Entertainment Law & Finance.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.