Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 5, 2018, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Prost, Dyk, and Chen issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge Dyk, in AbbVie Inc. v. MedImmune Ltd., 881 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2018). Despite finding that the district court relied on incorrect grounds, the panel affirmed the dismissal of the action without prejudice due to lack of declaratory-judgment jurisdiction.
Under an agreement that led to the development of the blockbuster antibody drug Humira, Abbvie was obligated to pay MedImmune royalties on sales of certain antibodies until “the last to expire of [certain] Patents or the expiry of fifteen years from the date of First Commercial Sale of a Product by [AbbVie's predecessor] … (whichever is later).” Id. at 1335. In hopes of ending its royalty obligations early, Abbvie brought a declaratory-judgment action in the Eastern District of Virginia, seeking a declaration that the sole patent-at-issue was invalid. While Abbvie argued that the patent's invalidity would constitute its expiration for purposes of the licensing agreement, it did not seek a declaration as to the contract's interpretation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.