Broker Agreed to Commission Based on Rent for First Five Years of Lease
Gator Hillside Village, LLC v. Schuckman Realty, Inc.
NYLJ 2/25/18, p. 24., col,. 5.
AppDiv, Second Dept.
Broker Agreed to Commission Based on Rent for First Five Years of Lease<br>Statements in Earlier Action Did Not Accelerate Mortgage and Trigger Statute of Limitations<br>Death Does Not Extend Foreclosure Limitations Period<br>Neighbor Granted Statutory Licence to Paint Fence<br>Record Did Not Establish Conveyance of Easement<br>Co-Tenant Entitled to Partition
Gator Hillside Village, LLC v. Schuckman Realty, Inc.
NYLJ 2/25/18, p. 24., col,. 5.
AppDiv, Second Dept.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN New York Real Estate Law Reporter
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), United States v. Heppner, has generated outsized commentary suggesting that the use of generative AI tools may jeopardize attorney-client privilege. A closer reading shows something far less dramatic.
The 2025 legislative cycle marked a pivotal year in U.S. privacy law, defined not only by continued nationwide expansion into AI) governance, children’s and teen privacy and online safety, as well as emerging data categories. In this article, we detail what enterprises need to be prepared for in 2026 and explain why we believe next year will be a watershed period for consumer privacy in the U.S.
Every decision to onboard a client, partner, lateral hire, contractor, consultant or expert witness carries risk. Yet despite the increasing complexity of that risk, many firms continue to rely on onboarding practices that have not kept pace with the digital world in which their clients and people operate. The result is a widening gap between how risk actually manifests today and how it is assessed at the point of onboarding.
Understanding the “not written by people” feature of AI software is the best lens for viewing AI transactions. The fact that an AI is not a legal entity, prompts the proper legal analysis of AI transactions.
A great debate seems to be rearing its head–is it better to conduct document review with traditional machine learning or with generative AI? This article examines traditional machine learning and generative AI in the context of review for production in litigation matters. While each party seeks to improve efficiency and defensibility, they differ meaningfully in workflow, transparency, human involvement, and overall impact on legal practice.