Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Arbitration Impact on Attorney Fees and Film Company Principal
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed a district court's award of attorney fees to Sony Corp. under §505 of the Copyright Act for winning a ruling that a lawsuit over a Sony Music songwriting contest should be sent to arbitration. Cortés-Ramos v. Sony Corp. of America, 16-2441.
Luis Adrián Cortés-Ramos filed suit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Puerto Rico alleging fraudulent inducement and copyright claims. He asserted that Ricky Martin's recording “Vida” was similar to a song Cortés-Ramos had submitted to the songwriting contest. But the district court found no fraudulent inducement and ruled the song dispute should be arbitrated under the contest agreement's mandatory arbitration clause.
When Cortés-Ramos' appealed the district court's §505 attorney fees award to Sony, the First Circuit concluded: “[T]he only material alteration in the parties' legal relationship concerning the Copyright Act arises from a ruling regarding the forum in which Cortés-Ramos' Copyright Act claims must be heard. But, the Copyright Act — unlike the Federal Arbitration Act, see 9 U.S.C. §2 — reflects no congressional policy favoring or disfavoring arbitration of claims. There thus has been no 'material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties in a manner which Congress sought to promote' when it enacted §505 of the Copyright Act.”
In different case, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, decided that an arbitrator lacked the authority to order a film production company principal into an arbitration brought under the production company's agreement with actor Bruce Willis. Willis pursued the arbitration claiming that Benaroya Pictures failed to properly pay him. The production company counterclaimed that Willis was in breach. The arbitrator ruled for Willis's company Westside, including by finding Benaroya Pictures principal Michael Benaroya, a non-signatory to the deal with Willis, was liable as his company's alter ego.
The court of appeal confirmed the $5,024,779 award, but dropped Michael Benaroya from arbitration liability by explaining: “Although a nonsignatory can be compelled to arbitrate, California case law is clear that 'an arbitrator has no power to determine the rights and obligations of one who is not a party to the arbitration agreement. The question of whether a nonsignatory is a party to an arbitration agreement is one for the trial court in the first instance.'” Benaroya v. Willis, B281761.
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance as well as an entertainment attorney and book author. He is also a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. For more information: www.stansoocher.com.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.