Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Tax-Exempt Entity's Property and a Lessee's Private Purpose
State and local governments grant tax-exempt status to properties that are used for certain activities, including religious and charitable purposes. Properties owned by government and educational institutions are tax-exempt as well, and these exemptions can extend to lessees of such property under certain circumstances, such as when the property continues to be used for a public purpose and such use is related to the function of the lessor entity.
Questions arise, however, when a tax-exempt property's use by a lessee involves an element of private profit. Is the tax-exempt status lost? Does that answer change if only a portion of the property is used to generate income for a privately-held entity? And if an agreement between a tax-exempt entity and a private party is not termed a “lease” by them, is the private party a lessee of property or something else altogether?
The Tax Court of New Jersey was asked to answer questions like these in Gourmet Dining, LLC v. Union Twp., 2018 N.J. Tax LEXIS 6 (Tax Court of New Jersey, 3/14/18), a recent case involving a restaurant space run by a for-profit vendor on the campus of a tax-exempt entity — a university. The scenario in Gourmet Dining is one likely to be repeated, in various guises, in other commercial contract situations involving tax-exempt entity-owned premises, so the court's reasoning may be instructive to those contemplating such business relationships.
The Contract
New Jersey Statutes Annotated (N.J.S.A.) section 54:4-1 provides that all real and personal property within the State of New Jersey is subject to annual taxation unless specifically exempted by the New Jersey legislature. If the legislature chooses to exempt a property from taxation, it may do so only by enacting general laws (N.J. Const. Art. VIII, section 1, para 2), and such exemptions from taxation may only be based on the use to which the property is put, not on the identity of the taxpayer. See, Township of Holmdel v. New Jersey Highway Auth., 190 N.J. 74 (2007).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?