Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Due Diligence in Distressed Community Hospitals
The Patient Population?
The Projected CAPEX
Cash Flow Hurdles
Family Rehabilitation, Inc. v. Azar- How effective has the hospital been in the structuring of “bundled” payments when compared to the actual costs of episodes of care?
- What is the count for “licensed” beds vs. the number of beds which could actually be occupied at “peak” capacity?
- What is the payor mix? What is the percentage of Medicare, Medicaid, third party insurance, high deductible patients, private pay and/or uninsured?
- Is there a history of underpayments, slow or delayed payments by third party administrators (TPAs) (which processes insurance claims or aspects of employee benefit plans)? Is the reimbursement rate similar to that of competitors?
- Is revenue being lost to ambulatory centers, outpatient facilities, area hospital systems or specialty clinics? Are the number and type of competitors increasing, changing or static?
- What is the status under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program which reduces reimbursement rates for “excess” patient readmissions?
Regulatory and Compliance Reviews
e.g. e.g.Governmental Claims
qui tam qui tam Qui tam qui tamOpportunities
e.g.Exit Issues
The National Conference of State Legislatures- Is there a pharmacy? If so, is it owned by the facility or operated by a third party?
- Is there a fragile patient population? If so, how long will it take to transfer all patients? How long will it take to stop admitting new patients?
- Is there an emergency room? If so, what is the process for diversion?
- Is there leased equipment? Can the equipment be moved?
- Who will take responsibility for the patient records? What is the cost for storage of records? Who will notify former patients regarding the location of their records?
- Are there land use restrictions? Can any restrictions be easily modified?
- Will the property need to be re-zoned?
Conclusion
***** Deborah Williamson [email protected] Mark Andrews [email protected] Richard Y. Cheng [email protected]This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.