Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New York Real Estate Law ReporterColumns & DepartmentsLandlord Tenant LawLitigation

Landlord & Tenant

By ssalkin
August 01, 2018
Unique Circumstances Require Rent Recomputation Matter of Migliaccio v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR)

City Human Rights Law Requires Landlord to Convert Window Into Wheelchair Accessible Entrance

Matter of Marine Holdings, LLC v. New York City Commission on Human Rights

Comment

State and federal law explicitly impose costs of modifications to apartments on the disabled tenant requesting the changes. The New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) states that “[i]t shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for the owner … [t]o refuse to permit, at the expense of a person with a disability, reasonable modifications of existing premises.” N.Y. Exec. Law §296.18(1) (McKinney). The Fair Housing Act (FHA) embodies similar language that clearly identifies the tenant's responsibility. 42 U.S.C. §12182(b)(2)(A)(iii). By contrast, the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) does not specify who bears the costs of modification. Rather, the statute imposes a balancing test and provides four factors to determine whether the landlord would face an “undue burden,” therefore relieving him of modification expenses. N.Y. ADMIN. CODE tit. 8, ch. 1, §8-102(18). While New York courts have not analyzed the meaning of burden in great detail, the Commission on Human Rights (the Commission) has interpreted the NYCHRL to impose the responsibility primarily on housing providers. Once the Commission establishes that the tenant's proposed modification is both reasonable and necessary, the Commission requires the landlord to make the modification at its own cost so long as the requested modification is neither financially burdensome nor architecturally infeasible. The Commission has required the landlord to make the modifications even when the landlord proposed, and the tenant rejected, reasonable alternatives. For instance, in , 2010 WL 8625897, the court required landlord to make a front entrance of the building accessible to the disabled tenant even though the landlord had already made a side entrance accessible. at 2. And in 2012 WL 1657556, at 10, the Commission overturned an ALJ's determination and required landlord to convert a window into a door to accommodate a disabled tenant, despite questions about the effect the conversion would have on the building's structural integrity, and despite landlord's offer to relocate the disabled tenant to an apartment elsewhere in the complex.

“As Is” Clause Does Not Bar Claim That Landlord Intentionally Caused Defective Conditions 

New WTC Retail Owner LLC v. Pachanga, Inc.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.